SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 1066

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Rajinder Singh Dogra, Judicial Member
Shaheena Banoo – Appellant
Versus
Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir – Respondent
Original Application No. 1122/2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Qadir Towkeer Nazir
For the Respondents: Mr. Hunar Gupta, ld. D.A.G.

Promissory estoppel binds State to honor departmental assurance of employment for donated land, preventing unjust enrichment.

Headnote:Under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, applicant challenged rejection of engagement claim as Sangini or Class-IV post in lieu of family-donated land for Anganwadi Centre, citing Government Orders including No.75-SW of 2008, No.128-SW of 2008, No.222-JK(SWD) of 2022, No.103-JK(SWD) of 2023. Facts involved land donation under departmental assurance of employment, with no compensation paid despite Centre's construction and use. Court found rejection arbitrary, ignoring official record of assurance. Issues framed around enforceability of assurance against HR Policy for Anganwadi engagements, applicability of prior judgment, and disputed facts. Ratio held that official departmental communication acknowledging assurance creates binding obligation under promissory estoppel; State cannot retain land benefit without honoring promise or providing compensation, as policy cannot override equity where reliance induced irreversible action and unjust enrichment occurs. Original Application allowed; impugned order quashed; respondents directed to engage applicant on suitable post within 12 weeks or face further remedy.

Table of Content
1. claim for engagement based on land donation assurance. (Para 1 , 2 , 6 , 7)
2. parties' contentions on policy vs. promise. (Para 3 , 4 , 8 , 9)
3. official document proves departmental assurance. (Para 10 , 11 , 12)
4. promissory estoppel prevents state unjust enrichment. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18)
5. order quashed; direct suitable engagement. (Para 19 , 20 , 21)

ORDER

Per: - Rajinder Singh Dogra, Judicial Member

1. The applicant has filed the present Original Application under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 seeking the following reliefs: -

a) Quash the Order No.ICDS/Th/Estt/2024/200-204 dated 07-08-2024 passed by the respondent No.4 by virtue of which the claim of the applicant regarding her engagement as Sangini or Class IV has been rejected in an arbitrary and mechanical manner by referring the Govt order No.75-SW of 2008 dated 05-03-2008, Govt. order No.128-SW of 2008 and Govt order No.222-JK(SWD) of 2022 dated 30- 11-2022 read with Govt order No.103-JK(SWD) of 2023 dated 28-04-2023 and letter No.SWD-ICDS/43/2022 dated 14-08-2023.

b) Directing the respondents to engage the applicant against suitable post of Sangini or against Class-IV post at village Malanoo Goila in the light of judgment passed in SWP No.142/2003 titled Parshotam Lal V/S State of Jammu and Kashmir and Ors. decided on 12-09-2003 reported in SLJ (506) respondents.

c) Commanding the respondents to issue appointment/ engagement letter to the applicant in lieu of the land donation which was owned by the applicant's family i.e. land measuring 04 Marlas falling under Khasra No.183/49 situated at Village Malanoo Goila Tehsil Kahara District Doda.

d) Restraining the respondents from filling up the vacant post of Sangini at village Malanoo Goila till the case of the applicant for her appointment engagement as Sangini at village Malanoo Goila is considered in lieu of the land donation by her family.

e) Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court may deem just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case be passed in favour of the applicant and against the respondents

2. The facts of the case as averred by the applicant in her pleadings, are as follows: -

a) The applicant, a resident of Village Malanoo Goila, Tehsil Kahara, District Doda, has approached this Tribunal under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, seeking quashment of Order No. ICDS/Th/Estt/2024/200-204 dated 07.08.2024, whereby her claim for engagement as Sangini (Anganwadi Worker) or alternatively against a Class-IV post has been rejected by the respondent authorities.

b) The case of the applicant, in brief, is that land measuring 04 marlas falling under Khasra No. 183/49 situated at Village Malanoo Goila originally belonged to the family of her great- grandfather-in-law. According to the applicant, the respondent- department approached her family for donation of the said land for construction of an Anganwadi Centre. It is asserted that the land was parted with on an assurance extended by the departmental authorities that one member of the donor family would be provided employment in the department in lieu thereof. Acting on such assurance, the land was allegedly donated without any monetary compensation, and an Anganwadi Centre building was constructed thereupon, which is presently functional.

c) The grievance of the applicant is that despite lapse of considerable time and repeated representations, neither any employment nor any rent or compensation has been provided to her family. It is further contended that a post of Sangini at Anganwadi Centre, Malanoo Goila fell vacant in the year 2023, yet the respondents initiated steps to fill up the said post through fresh advertisement, ignoring the claim of the applicant, which according to her, is founded upon the doctrine of promissory estoppel.

d) Aggrieved by inaction, the applicant earlier approached this Tribunal by filing O.A. No. 61/684/2024, which was disposed of with a direction to the respond

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top