Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Rajinder Singh Dogra, Judicial Member
Shaheena Banoo – Appellant
Versus
Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. claim for engagement based on land donation assurance. (Para 1 , 2 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. parties' contentions on policy vs. promise. (Para 3 , 4 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. official document proves departmental assurance. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. promissory estoppel prevents state unjust enrichment. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 5. order quashed; direct suitable engagement. (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
ORDER
Per: - Rajinder Singh Dogra, Judicial Member
1. The applicant has filed the present Original Application under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 seeking the following reliefs: -
a) Quash the Order No.ICDS/Th/Estt/2024/200-204 dated 07-08-2024 passed by the respondent No.4 by virtue of which the claim of the applicant regarding her engagement as Sangini or Class IV has been rejected in an arbitrary and mechanical manner by referring the Govt order No.75-SW of 2008 dated 05-03-2008, Govt. order No.128-SW of 2008 and Govt order No.222-JK(SWD) of 2022 dated 30- 11-2022 read with Govt order No.103-JK(SWD) of 2023 dated 28-04-2023 and letter No.SWD-ICDS/43/2022 dated 14-08-2023.
b) Directing the respondents to engage the applicant against suitable post of Sangini or against Class-IV pos
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
