Saidullah Ahangar vs Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 1072

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Rajinder Singh Dogra, Judicial Member
Saidullah Ahangar – Appellant
Versus
Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Ahtsham Hussain
For the Respondents: Mr. Sudesh Magotra, AAG

Table of Content
1. applicant's service history and regularization claims (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. undisputed facts and core grievance (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
3. sro-64 mandates timely regularization (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
4. entitlement to old pension scheme (Para 12 , 13 , 14)
5. directions for retrospective benefits (Para 15 , 16)

ORDER

Per: - Rajinder Singh Dogra, Judicial Member

1. The applicant has filed the present Original Application under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 seeking the following reliefs: -

In view of the facts mentioned in para5 above the applicant prays for the following relief(s) :-

That the Hon'ble Tribunal may kindly be pleased to quash the order dated 25.04.2018 by virtue of which the applicant was put under NPS and have given regularization from February 2013 being illegal, arbitrary and discriminatory.

Further directing the respondents to give effect of regularization of service of the applicant since from the day he has completed 07 years in the department as adhoc employee w.e.f 1996 alongwith all consequential relief: Further directing the respondents to put the applicant under the old pension scheme and not under all NPS by granting the retrospec

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2026 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 1072

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNALRajinder Singh Dogra, Judicial MemberSaidullah Ahangar – AppellantVersusUnion Territory of Jammu and Kashmir – Respondent

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Rajinder Singh Dogra, Judicial Member
Saidullah Ahangar – Appellant
Versus
Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir – Respondent