SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 1091

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Ashok Kumar Pandita – Appellant
Versus
General Administrative Department – Respondent


ORDER

Per: - Rajinder Singh Dogra, Judicial Member

1. The applicant has filed the present Original Application under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 seeking the following reliefs: -

a) Quashing/setting aside the Government Order No. 17 JK (Rev) of 2025, dated 11-2-2025, issued by respondent No. 2, whereby, sanction accorded to the grant of superannuation pension and other benefits in favour of the applicant has been withdrawn abinitio and post facto sanction purportedly under Article 168- D of the J&K CSR has been accorded to the grant of provisional pension in his favour and PPO, GPO & CPO dated 23-12-2024, issued by respondent No. 4 and Cash in Lieu/Leave Salary sanctioned vide Govt order No. 135 JK (Rev) of 2024, dated 27-11-2024 by the Revenue Department rescinded deemed abinitio and remain withheld till the conclusion of judicial/ departmental proceedings and passing of the final orders.

b) Communication No. PNRJ-1/2024-25/C-3/3073-76, dated 3-3- 2025, issued by respondent No. 4 to respondent No. 3, as being unconstitutional, illegal and contrary to the provisions of the law particularly the provisions of the J&K Civil Services Regulation.

c) Such other additio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top