SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 1121

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL JAMMU BENCH, JAMMU
Rajinder Singh Dogra, J, Ram Mohan Johri, Administrative Member
Sanjay Kumar – Appellant
Versus
D/o Power Development Ut Of J&k – Respondent
Transfer Application No. 6081/2021|SWP No. 336/2018



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Ashwani Sharma
For the Respondents: Hunar Gupta

Employees engaged against vacancies and serving prior to a pension scheme cut-off date cannot be denied old pension benefits if the delay in their formal regularization was caused by the employer's administrative lapses.

Headnote:The petitioners, who were engaged as daily wagers/PDL/TDL in the Power Development Department prior to 01.01.2010, challenged the applicability of the Jammu & Kashmir Civil Services (Defined Contribution Pension Scheme) Rules, 2010 (SRO 400) and sought the benefit of the old pension scheme and GPF accounts. Although they were regularized as Class-IV employees via a DPC order dated 14.10.2013 under the Jammu & Kashmir Power Development Department (Subordinate) Service Recruitment Rules, 1981 (SRO 381), they contended that the delay in regularization was attributable to the department and should not deprive them of benefits accrued from their initial engagement. The primary issue was whether employees engaged against available vacancies and serving continuously before 01.01.2010 can be denied the old pension scheme solely because formal regularization occurred after the cut-off date due to administrative delay. The court reasoned that an employee cannot suffer for the inaction or administrative lapses of the employer, and that pension is a deferred compensation protected under Article 300-A of the Constitution of India, not a bounty. The Transfer Application is allowed. The applicants shall be counted as regular government employees from the date they became entitled (07 years from the date of engagement) and shall be governed by the old pension scheme with the allotment of GPF account numbers.

Table of Content
1. background of engagement and regularization of daily wagers and the dispute over pension scheme applicability. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
2. administrative delay by the employer cannot be used to deprive employees of substantive service and pensionary benefits. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
3. pension is a statutory right and deferred compensation under article 300-a, not a bounty, and cannot be waived by estoppel. (Para 14)
4. entitlement to old pension scheme and gpf based on initial engagement and eligibility prior to the cut-off date. (Para 15 , 16)

ORDER

Per: - Rajinder Singh Dogra, Judicial Member

1. The SWP No.336/2018 was transferred from the Hon’ble High Court of Jammu & Kashmir at Jammu and was registered as T.A No.6081/2020 by the Registry of this Tribunal.

2. The present matter was filed before the Hon’ble High Court seeking following relief: -

a) “Writ of Certiorari seeking quashing of notification dated 24.12.2009 issued vide SRO 400 by respondent No.1 so for as it pertains to Rule-4 (i) and (ii) provided in Schedule (XXIII) Annexure 'A' with the SRO being not applicable to the case of petitioners.

b) With a further direction to the respondents to grant benefit of seniority and other consequential benefits from the date the petitioners have completed seven years of regular service as daily wagers.

c) With a further direction to the respondents to allot General Provident Fund Account number to the petitioners enabling the petitioners to contribute towards the General Provident Fund.

d) Any other writ, order or direction whatever the Hon'ble Court may deem fit under the circumstances of the case may also be passed in faovur of the petitioners.”

3. The facts of the case as pleaded by the petitioners in their pleadings are as follows: -

a) The present Transfer Application arises out of SWP No. 336/2018, which was originally filed before the Hon’ble High Court of Jammu & Kashmir at Jammu and, upon transfer, was registered as T.A. No. 6081/2021 before this Tribunal.

b) The applicants are permanent residents of the erstwhile State of Jammu & Kashmir and citizens of India. They were initially engaged by the Power Development Department as Daily Wagers against available vacancies and, on account of their continuous service and experience, were subsequently categorized as Temporary Daily Labourers (TDL) / Permanent Daily Labourers (PDL). The dates of their engagement as TDL/PDL stand duly reflected in the departmental records and promotion orders placed on record.

c) Pursuant to Cabinet Decision No. 151/23/2012 dated 30.08.2012, conveyed through communication dated 03.09.2012, the Power Development Department was authorized to consider eligible PDL/TDL workers for promotion against available vacancies, subject to the condition that no new posts would be created. In furtherance thereof, the Chief Engineer, EM&RE Wing, Jammu recommended the cases of eligible PDL/TDL employees, including the applicants, and guidelines were issued by the Administrative Department for convening the Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC).

d) Accordingly, the cases of the applicants were considered by the duly constituted DPC, and vide Order No. CEJ/DPC/13 of 2013 dated 14.10.2013, they were promoted/regularized as Class-IV employees against available vacancies in accordance with the Jammu & Kashmir Power Development Department (Subordinate) Service Recruitment Rules, 1981 notified vide SRO 381. The applicants joined the promoted posts and have since been discharging their duties satisfactorily.

e) The grievance of the applicants arose when, despite their long and continuous service rendered prior to 01.01.2010 as PDL/TDL/work-charged employees, they were sought to be governed by the Jammu & Kashmir Civil Services (Defined Contribution Pension Scheme) Rules, 2010, notified vide SRO 400 dated 24.12.2009. The applicants were directed to apply for allotment of PRAN numbers under the New Pension Scheme (NPS), failing which the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top