SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 1159

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Manish Garg, Judicial Member, Rajinder Kashyap, Administrative Member
Sandeep Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Govt. of NCT of Delhi – Respondent
Original Application



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Rajesh Kumar Chauhan
For the Respondents: Ranjan Tyagi

Judicial review of medical unfitness in disciplined force recruitments limited to procedural breaches or discrepancies; courts defer to expert boards absent specified grounds for interference.

Headnote:(A) Service Law - Medical fitness for recruitment in disciplined forces - Applicant declared unfit due to hypertension and obesity in detailed medical examination (DME) and review medical examination (RME) - Medical standards require candidates to be free from defect, deformity and disease - Subsequent fitness certificate from another hospital does not warrant interference absent procedural breach or discrepancy - Principles for judicial review of medical board decisions strictly circumscribed. (Paras 3, 4, 6)

(B) Judicial Review - Scope in medical fitness cases - Courts to exercise circumspection and defer to expert medical boards - Interference justified only in cases of procedural irregularity, notable discrepancies between DME and RME, absence of required specialists, or unexplained disregard of specialist opinions or mandatory tests - Outside medical opinions generally insufficient for re-examination. (Para 6 quoting SSC v. Aman Singh)

(C) Recruitment to Police Forces - Stringent physical fitness standards indispensable - Conditions like persistently elevated blood pressure disqualify candidates as they may impair performance under pressure - Unfitness specific to disciplined forces roles. (Paras 6.5, 6.6)

Facts of the case:
Applicant, shortlisted for constable post after qualifying physical tests, declared medically unfit due to hypertension (BP readings 168/94, 162/106) and obesity (BMI 29.8) in DME on 23.01.2024, confirmed in RME on 03.02.2024. Sought setting aside of unfitness reports and fresh examination based on later fitness certificate from state hospital.

Findings of Court:
Medical board decisions final unless vitiated by procedural flaws or other enumerated grounds for interference; no such grounds present; stringent fitness requirements for disciplined forces upheld.

Issues: Whether rejection on grounds of hypertension and obesity justified; scope of judicial interference with medical board findings; effect of conflicting external medical opinion.

Ratio Decidendi: Judicial review limited to procedural compliance and specified irregularities; courts defer to medical experts on fitness for disciplined forces; no interference where DME and RME concur on disqualifying conditions per prescribed standards.

Result: Original Application dismissed.

Table of Content
1. applicant challenges medical unfitness for constable appointment. (Para 1 , 2)
2. parties contest fitness based on hypertension and obesity findings. (Para 3 , 4)
3. judicial review limited; deference to medical boards in force recruitment. (Para 5)
4. oa dismissed upholding medical unfitness for disciplined force. (Para 6 , 7 , 8)

O R D E R (ORAL)

Hon’ble Mr. Manish Garg, Member (J)

1.By virtue of the instant Original Application, the applicant seeks the following relief(s):-

“i) To set aside the medical report dated 19.1.2024 (copy never supplied, thus not annexed) and Review Medical examination report dated 3.2.2024 whereby the applicant was declared medically ‘unfit’ and to further direct the respondents that the applicant be subjected to a fresh medical examination in any recognized/reputed hospital of the government in NCR at the earliest and if found fit then 12:42:16 to appoint the applicant to the post of Constable(Exe) Male in present selection process with all consequential benefits including seniority & promotion and pay & allowances.

And/or Any other relief which this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper may also awarded to the applicant.”

2. The matter pertains to rejection of candidature on the issue of medical examination. The applicant has been suffering from Hypertension and Obesity. The candidature of the applicant has been rejected by DME and RME also. However, this is not the disputed fact.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant was examined at Civil Hospital, Rohtak dated 29.04.2024, whereby he was declared physically fit to perform his duties.

4. Learned counsel for the respondents vehemently opposes to grant of Interim Relief. He relies upon the averments contained in the counter affidavit. Paras 9, 10 & (m) of the counter affidavit read as under:-

“9. That applicant candidate Sandeep Kumar [Roll No. 2214048424] son of Sh. Umed Singh, resident of VPO Singhwa Khas, District Hissar, Haryana- 125042 (here-in-after called the applicant) had applied for recruitment to the post of Constable (Exe) Male in Delhi Police examination 2023 under UR+ESM category and shortlisted by the SSC in the CBE for appearing in Physical Endurance & Measurement Test (referred in short as PE&MT). The PE&MT of the applicant was held at DPA/Jharoda Kalan, Delhi in Ground No. 8 on 18.01.2024. After successfully qualifying the PE&MT, his documents checking/verification was conducted on the same day as per instructions laid down under para 16.8 of notice of 12:42:16 the examination dt. 01.09.2023.

10. That the Detailed Medical Examination (DME) of the applicant was conducted on 23.01.2024 by the Medical Board consisting of members as senior doctors. The B.P. of the applicant was recorded as 168/94 and 162/106. The BMI of the applicant was recorded as 29.8. Hence, the applicant was declared medically UNFIT on account of “Hypertension & Obesity” by the Medical Board. Photocopies of the DME of the applicant are annexed herewith and marked as Annexure- R/’1’.

(m) That according to Standing Order No. HRD/04/2022 of Delhi Police and Recruitment Notice of the Examination dt. 01.09.2023 at Point Nos. 11 and 13 respectively under captioned ‘Medical Standard for Constable (Executive) Male & Femals’ in this connection, it is submitted that the prescribed medical standards requires the candidates to be free from defect, deformity and disease. In the present case, the applicant has been found to have “Hypertansion” and “Obesity” in Direct Medical Examination as well as in Review Medical Examination. As such, it is evident that the applicant did not meet the desired medical standard of “Free from defect” prescribed for the said post. Hence, the applicant was rightly declared medically Unfit in his DME and RME by the Medical Board comprising of senior Doctors whose professional competencies cannot be challenged and the report of Medical Examination concluded by the Medical Board has become “fait accompli” as decision of R

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top