Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Sunil Thomas, Judicial Member, Sanjiv Kumar, Administrative Member
Ravinder Daravath – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of sexual harassment and passport noc issues. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. disciplinary proceedings, inquiry, removal, and appellate process. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. high court intervention and fresh challenge to orders. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. high court order limiting inquiry to charge i, avoiding double jeopardy. (Para 15 , 16) |
| 5. new extraneous allegations in fresh order beyond original charge i. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 6. charge i facts: false declaration as private employee. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 7. misconduct requires ill motive, not mere negligence or error. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 8. penalty proportionality and reasoned imposition required. (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35) |
| 9. authority must justify selection of specific penalty. (Para 36 , 37 , 38 , 39) |
| 10. remand for reconsideration of misconduct and proportionality. (Para 40 , 41 , 42) |
O R D E R :-
Per: Justice Sunil Thomas, Judicial Member
The applicant challenges Annexure A-2 order, by which appeal filed by him challenging Annexure A-1 order of removal from service issued to the 5th respondent, with effect from 07.12.2020, invoking Rule 11 of CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965, was dism
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
