SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 1175

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Rakesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Home Department – Respondent


ORDER

Per: - Rajinder Singh Dogra, Judicial Member

1. The applicant has filed the present Original Application under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 seeking the following reliefs: -

a) To issue directions to the respondents to consider the case of the applicant for fixing and releasing of the family pension in favour of the applicant being husband (legal heir) of the deceased Neelam Devi, Head Constable by issuance of Writ of Mandamus;

b) To issue directions to the respondents to release General Provident Fund, Death Gratuity, Leave Encashment and all other consequential service benefits in favour of the applicant by issuance of writ of Mandamus;

c) To declare the act of the respondents by which the respondents have not granted the family pension and other consequential service benefits in favour of the applicant being a husband of the deceased Neelam Devi, Head Constable as ultra-vires, illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, unjust and contrary to the provisions of law and rules and against the provisions of principles of natural justice by issuance of writ of Mandamus.”

2. The facts of the case as averred by the applicants in their pleadings, are as follows: -

a) The

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top