SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 1208

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Rajinder Kumar Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Audit And Account Department – Respondent


ORDER

Per: - Rajinder Singh Dogra, Judicial Member

1. The applicant has filed the present Original Application under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 seeking the following reliefs: -

a) “allow the instant Original Application;

b) quash PPO No. 1124189621 dated 12.07.2024 issued by respondent no. 1 to the extent it fixes the pension of the applicant at a diminished rate than the last pay drawn by the applicant @ Rs. 1,22,600/- whereas the last basic pay drawn by the applicant was Rs. 1,30,100/-/-;

c) command and direct the respondents to compute, fix and disburse the pension of the applicant on the basis of last pay drawn by the applicant and pay the arrears of the pension to the applicant;

d) command and direct the respondents to release the gratuity and other allied benefits in favour of the applicant in accordance with Rule 242 of Civil Services Regulations, 1956 read with the judgment pronounced by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in a mater titled State of Punjab versus Rafiq Masih, Thomas Daniel v/s State of Kerala and Jagdish Prasad Singh v/s State of Bihar;

e) command and direct the respondents not to make any further recoveries from the applicant and refund the recove

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top