CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
K K Pradhan – Appellant
Versus
Revenue – Respondent
O R D E R
Per Hon’ble Mr. Suchitto Kumar Das, Administrative Member :
1. The applicant has approached this Tribunal under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 praying for the following relief(s):
“(a) An order holding that the impugned order dated 17.06.2021 imposing penalty of 30% cut in pension & gratuity, being violative of CVC Circular dated 23.05.2000 and 1st proviso of Rule 9(1) of CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972 is not maintainable and liable to be quashed.
(b) An order holding that the applicant is entitled to continue with full pension on regular basis and also full gratuity wrongly withheld by the respondent authorities.
(c) An order quashing the imposition of penalty under Rule 9(1) of CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972 by way of 30% cut in pension and gratuity of the applicant herein, as made in the impugned order dated 17.06.2021.
(d) An order issuing directions upon the respondent authorities to grant full pension to the applicant on regular basis instead of provisional pension as paid hitherto and grant 100% gratuity, as withheld till date along with interest, as admissible.
(e) An order directing the respondent authorities to provide production of relevant documents.
(f) A
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.