SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 1267

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
K K Pradhan – Appellant
Versus
Revenue – Respondent


O R D E R

Per Hon’ble Mr. Suchitto Kumar Das, Administrative Member :

1. The applicant has approached this Tribunal under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 praying for the following relief(s):

“(a) An order holding that the impugned order dated 17.06.2021 imposing penalty of 30% cut in pension & gratuity, being violative of CVC Circular dated 23.05.2000 and 1st proviso of Rule 9(1) of CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972 is not maintainable and liable to be quashed.

(b) An order holding that the applicant is entitled to continue with full pension on regular basis and also full gratuity wrongly withheld by the respondent authorities.

(c) An order quashing the imposition of penalty under Rule 9(1) of CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972 by way of 30% cut in pension and gratuity of the applicant herein, as made in the impugned order dated 17.06.2021.

(d) An order issuing directions upon the respondent authorities to grant full pension to the applicant on regular basis instead of provisional pension as paid hitherto and grant 100% gratuity, as withheld till date along with interest, as admissible.

(e) An order directing the respondent authorities to provide production of relevant documents.

(f) A

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top