SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 1276

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Narendra Kumar Johari, J, Kumar Rajesh Chandra, A
Narayan Lal – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
OA/051/00900/2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Applicant-in-person
For the Respondents: Pravin Kumar Pandey, ASC

Transfers are service incidents; must join posting first; no judicial interference absent mala fides or statutory violation.

Headnote:The applicant challenged transfer orders issued by defence accounts authorities, citing violations of transfer policies limiting service at hard/tenure stations to two terms, personal medical issues, and family hardships including father's mental illness. Relevant policies include Transfer Policy dated 14.09.2022 (Para 2.1(a), 3.1) and 28.03.2024. The Tribunal found no violation of mandatory rules, no evidence of mala fides or bias, and transfers made per administrative feasibility and DAPB recommendations, classifying Ramgarh as special category station per policy dated 24.03.2023. Key issue: Whether transfers to Gopalpur (hard/tenure station) violated policy after prior tenures and ignored representations on medical grounds. Ratio: Transfers are incidents of service; employees must join posting before seeking redress; courts interfere only if mala fide or statutory violation proven, as per Supreme Court precedents emphasizing administrative exigencies over individual preferences (Shilpi Bose v. State of Bihar; S.C. Saxena v. UOI; State of UP v. Govardhan Lal). OA dismissed; no interference with transfers; applicant directed to comply, with pending applications disposed.

Table of Content
1. applicant challenges transfers violating hard station policy and medical grounds. (Para 1 , 2)
2. respondents justify transfers on administrative feasibility and absence from duty. (Para 3)
3. rejoinder reinforces contentions against transfer validity. (Para 4)
4. court rejects bias, policy violation claims; upholds transfers. (Para 5)
5. oa dismissed; no merit in challenge to administrative transfers. (Para 6)

ORDER

Per Kumar Rajesh Chandra, A.M..:- This OA has been filed by the applicant seeking the following relief:-

“(a) That the Respondent No. 5 be directed to cancel the Order dated 20.09.2024 bearing No. AN/1B/111/NL/GT/2024 (Annexure-12) passed by Additional Controller of Defence Accounts, Patna, Respondent No.5 without properly considering the Applicant’s representation dated 10.09.2024 and without following the Transfer Policy No. 0600/AN-X/Vol. XXI dated 28.03.2024 and Transfer Policy No. AN/1B/038/T.P./Vol-VIII dated 14/09/2022, passed the order dated 20.09.2024 in arbitrary manner. That the Respondent No. 4 be directed to cancel the transfer of the order bearing transfer Order No. AN/IB/111/Bihar/GT/2023 dated 19.05.2023 (Annexure-5) issued from the Office of the Controller of Defence Accounts, Patna, Respondent No. 4 with respect to the Applicant is concerned by which the Applicant is transferred from LAO(A) Ramgarh to PAO (Ors) AAD, Gopalpur whereby and whereunder the Respondent No. 4 has not considered that the Applicant has served two times in Hard/Tenure Station and as per the policy decision issued by the Government that in whole service tenure only two times Hard/Tenure Station has to be served by a service holders of the Respondent authorities and also not considered the medical grounds given by the Applicant. That the Respondent No. 8 be directed to cancel the relieving Order dated 02.06.2023 (Annexure-7) issued by the LAO (Ramgarh), Respondent No. 7, whereby and whereunder the respondents relieved the Applicant for joining the transferable post of PAO(Ors) AAD Gopalpur and to direct the Respondent No. 7 to cancel order letter No. AN/1B/111/NL/GT/2024 dated 11/11/2024 (Annexure-15) passed by the Senior Accounts Officer (AN) of the office of the Controller of Defence Accounts, Patna, Respondent No.7, whereby and whereunder the Respondent authority has not properly considered the case of the Petitioner/Applicant and disposed arbitrarily the all letters of the Petitioner/Applicant on the ground that they have passed the speaking order dated 20.09.2024. AND to direct the Respondents to release the arrears of salary as well as current salary and credit Earned Leave etc. and all other consequential benefits in favour of the applicant/petitioner.” 

2. The brief facts of the case, as per the applicant, are as follows:-

(i) The applicant on his appointment as Auditor in Defence Account joined in December, 2010 at Pune and promoted to the post of Senior Auditor on 01.04.2014. In December, 2014 he was transferred from Pune to Gopalpur (Orissa) as Senior Auditor which comes under the category of Hard/Tenure Station as per Para 2.1(a) of the Transfer Policy of Controller of Defence Accounts (CDA) Patna dated 14.09.2022 (Annexure-1) duly approved by the Competent Authority. In October, 2017 he was transferred from Gopalpur (Orissa) to Ramgarh (Jharkhand) which also comes under the category of Hard/Tenure Station as per Para 2.1 (a) of the said Transfer Policy.

(ii) It is contended that the applicant is suffering from Liver and Kidney problems (Annexure-2) and his father is also suffering from mental illness (Annexure-2A) whose mental treatment is going on in C.I.P, Kanke, Ranchi which he had already intimated to the CDA, Patna by his representation dated 12.12.2022 (Annexure-3). By representation dated 04.01.2023 (Annexure-4) the applicant requested the CDA Patna to transfer him to Ranchi for medical treatment.

(iii) It is alleged by applicant that instead of transfer to Ranchi the applicant was again transferre

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top