Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Rajinder Singh Dogra, Judicial Member, Ram Mohan Johri, Administrative Member
Pritam Chand – Appellant
Versus
State through Commissioner Secretary General Administration Department – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. transfer from high court; seeks rule correction for promotion. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. respondents deny feeder cadre; applicant rebuts with orders. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. service history and cadre upgrade via govt orders. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. harmonious rule interpretation; no penalty for admin lapse. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 5. application allowed; regularization directed. (Para 22 , 23) |
ORDER
Per: - Rajinder Singh Dogra, Judicial Member
1. The SWP No.1618/2018 was transferred from the Hon’ble High Court of Jammu & Kashmir at Jammu and was registered as T.A No.739/2021 by the Registry of this Tribunal.
2. The present matter was filed before the Hon’ble High Court seeking following relief: -
a) Commanding respondent no. 1, to effect correction in whatever way and manner under rules is necessitated, correcting the expression Headquarter Assistant, as is occurring in Schedule - II to SRO 285 (Jammu and Kashmir Rural Development (Gazetted Services Recruitment Rules) of 2003, against Clause V, Entry (A) (Method of Recruitment) (ii) and substitute the same by the expression Superintendent / Office Manager (Section Officer).
b) Commanding responde
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
