Question 1? Question 2? Question 3?

Key Points: - The tribunal partly allows the writ petition and directs consideration of the petitioner against available vacancies, balancing institutional autonomy with individual fairness. (!) (!) - The relief is confined to consideration of the petitioner for Health Inspector/Health Assistant vacancies in GMC Rajouri, Doda or Kathua, advertised in 2019, with a three-month deadline for completion of the exercise. (!) (!) (!) - The court held that while recruitment policy is generally within the employer’s domain, eligibility criteria must bear a rational nexus to the duties, and quashing entire selections is not warranted; instead, a targeted relief addressing eligibility against existing vacancies is appropriate. (!) (!) (!) - The petition challenged the use of general graduation as the qualification for the posts where technical qualifications are available, noting a lack of rational basis for differing standards between newly established colleges and existing health rules. (!) (!) (!) - The respondents argued that the Service Selection Board must follow the indenting department’s qualifications and cannot modify them; the court acknowledged limited interference but emphasized rationality in eligibility. (!) (!) - The decision emphasizes that participation in the process does not bar relief when the challenge concerns eligibility criteria; the court cites Ashok Kumar v. State of Bihar. (!) - No order as to costs. (!)

Question 1?

Question 2?

Question 3?