Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Om Prakash VII, J, Manju Pandey, A
Ravindra Kumar Tiwari – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of disciplinary proceedings (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. respondents defend procedural compliance (Para 3) |
| 3. rival arguments on rule 15 violation (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. precedents mandate disagreement note (Para 8 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. rule 15(2) mandates tentative disagreement (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 6. mandatory provision violation vitiates enquiry (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 7. orders quashed; remanded for disagreement note (Para 21 , 22) |
ORDER
By Justice Om Prakash VII, Member (J)):-
This Original Application is filed under section 19 of the Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985, seeking following reliefs
“(a) That this Hon'ble Tribunal be pleased to quash the impugned Order-in-Appeal No.01/2019, dated 30.07.2019, passed by Sri Rajeev Tandon, Principal Chief Commissioner, Central Goods and Services Tax and Central Excise, Lucknow Zone Lucknow/Appellate Authority, as also the impugned Order-in-Original dated 29/30.04.2019, passed by the Commissioner Central Goods and Service Tax and Central Excise, Lucknow/Disciplianary Authority (Annexure Nos. A-1 and A-2 to Compilation No.1), with all consequential benefits in favour of the applicant.
(b) That this Hon'ble Tribunal be pleased to gra
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
