CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL CUTTACK BENCH, CUTTACK [Arising out of OA 498/2021 disposed of on 28.11.2025]

DATED: 10.02.2026 CORAM:

THE HON’BLE SHRI SUDHI RANJAN MISHRA, MEMBER (J) THE HON’BLE SHRI PRAMOD KUMAR DAS, MEMBER (A)

Srinibas Bhoi ..….…Review Applicant VERSUS Union of India & Ors ….…Review Respondents For the applicant : Mr. D.P.Dhalsamant, Counsel For the respondents:…..

O R D E R [Circulation]

PRAMOD KUMAR DAS, MEMBER (A):

Admittedly, under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC, a judgment may be open to review, if there is a mistake or an error apparent on the face of the record. An error which is not self-evident and has to be detected by a process of reasoning, can hardly be said to be an error apparent on the face of the record justifying the court to exercise its power of review under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC. In exercise of the jurisdiction under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC it is not permissible for an erroneous decision to be "reheard and corrected". A review jurisdiction is not an appeal in disguise. The above view is fortified by the decision of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of State of West Bengal v. Kamal Sengupta, (2008) 8 SCC 612, wherein the Hon’ble Apex Court had an occasion to cons