Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Chhabilendra Roul, Member (A), Rajveer Singh Verma, Member (J)
Priyanka Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Comptroller General of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's deputation, leaves, and repatriation disputes (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. respondents deny absorption, cite order withdrawals (Para 3) |
| 3. applicant asserts deputation/posting orders remain valid (Para 4) |
| 4. entitlement to absorption per recruitment rules sequence (Para 5) |
| 5. deputationist status and absorption claim (Para 6) |
| 6. distinct cadres, no absorption right on personal deputation (Para 7) |
| 7. rejoinder on upsc consultation requirement (Para 8) |
| 8. no absorption under circular or dop&t guidelines (Para 9) |
| 9. direct deputation to headquarters, deny absorption (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
ORDER By Dr. Chhabilendra Roul, Member (A)
Present OA has been filed by the applicant under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 seeking the following relief:
“(i) to quash and set aside the impugned orders dated 16.10.2024 rejecting the application of the extension of Child Care Leave.
(ii) to quash and set aside order 16.5.2024 ordering premature repatriation of the applicant.
(iii) to consider the applicant for absorption in the office of DG (I&A) at Delhi as per RRs which allow the posts to be filled through absorption.
(iv) to direct the respondent to extend the same benefits of
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
