Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Harvinder Kaur Oberoi, Judicial Member, Sumeet Jerath, Administrative Member
Yalla Kishore – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicants promoted to ee against 2011-12 vacancies due to delayed dpc. (Para 2) |
| 2. regular service from vacancy year per precedents; art.14/16 violation claimed. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. respondents defend: no policy for notional promotion; physical service required. (Para 5) |
| 4. rejoinder: service from vacancy year, not physical promotion. (Para 6) |
| 5. regular service counts from 01.04.2011; oa allowed with directions. (Para 7 , 8) |
ORDER
Hon'ble Dr. Sumeet Jerath, Member (A) :
The instant OA has been filed by the applicants under section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 seeking the following reliefs:-
"i) Declare the action of the respondents illegal and arbitrary in discriminating the applicants from the direct recruits; and
ii) Declare the respondents to count the regular service of the applicants in the grade from 2011 from the period against the quota vacancy in which the applicants have been promoted; and
iii) Declare that the applicants have also completed the regular service of 5 years in the grade and further direct the respondents to consider the applicants' for grant of promotion to the grade of EE (NFSG); and
iv) Direct the respondents to grant all consequenti
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
