Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Anindo Majumdar, Administrative Member, Diwakar Singh, Judicial Member
Bindhyachal Ram – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of procedural history and disciplinary timeline. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. applicant's challenge to fresh chargesheet validity. (Para 4) |
| 3. respondents defend procedural compliance and responsibility. (Para 5) |
| 4. prior tribunal order required mindful decision on proceeding. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 5. dropping chargesheet procedurally permits fresh inquiry. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 6. enquiry conducted with opportunity; appeal rejected. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 7. limited judicial review of disciplinary findings. (Para 17 , 18) |
| 8. no infirmity in penalty despite injuries; oa dismissed. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
ORDER
Per: Mr. Anindo Majumdar, Administrative Member:
The applicant has approached this Tribunal under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985 praying for the following relief(s):
“i) An order directing the respondents to comply with the Hon'ble Tribunal order dated 13.06.2013 in its true letter and spirit.
ii) An order directing the respondents to cancel, withdraw or delete the lower portion of order/letter dated 04.04.2014 "in order to give fullest opportunity to Shri Ram to participate & defend as per Rule 16 (A-A) of CCS (CCA) Rules 1965 in an inquiry have to
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
