2026 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 1557
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Krishna Mohan Jha – Appellant
Versus
M/o Railways – Respondent
O.A./827/2018
##PAGE1##
1
(Reserved on 09.01.2026)
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
JABALPUR BENCH
(Circuit Sitting at Bilaspur)
Indore this the 05th day of February, 2026
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AKHIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, JUDICIAL MEMBER
HON’BLE MRS. MALLIKA ARYA, ADMINISTRATIVE MEMBER
Original Application No. 827 of 2018
1. Krishna Mohan Jha, S/o Late Murlidhar Jha, Aged about 48
years, employed as SSE (Works), SECR/BSP, R/o Nutan
Kunj, Tirupati Nagar, Hemunagar, Bilaspur – 495004 (CG).
2. Abodh Kumar, S/o Shri Ram Yatan Sah, Aged about 38
years, employed as SSE (Works), SECR/BSP, R/o Rly. Qrt.
No. 1376/2, Wireless Colony, Bilaspur – 495004 (CG).
…….Applicants
V E R S U S
Union of India through the General Manager, S.E.C Railway,
Bilaspur Zone, Headquarters’ Office, Bilaspur – 495004 (CG).
1.
The Senior Divisional Personnel Officer, SEC Railway,
Bilaspur Division, DRM’s Office, Bilaspur – 495004 (CG).
2.
Mr. Aditya Kumar (PF05642607) working as SSE (Works)
Siding/Bilaspur (Special) under DEN/Siding, S.E.C. Railway,
3.
Bilaspur – 495004 (CG).
4. Mr. J.P. Pateria (PF07980048) working as SSE (Works)
North/Bilaspur (Incharge) under ADEN/Settelment, S.E.C.
Railway, Bilaspur – 495004 (CG).
5. Mr. Pradeep Kumar (PF06175132) working as SSE (Works)
Umariya/(Incharge) under ADEN/S.E.C. Railway, Umariya
(MP).
Page 1 of 6
ANAND 2026.02.10
PRAKASH 14:09:34
DUBEY +05'30'
##PAGE2##2
6. Mr. M.K. Gupta (PF09795531) working as SSE (Works)
Special/Bilaspur under ADEN/Settlement II/ S.E.C. Railway,
Bilaspur – 495004 (CG).
7. Mr. Rajesh Prasad Rana (PF09AB0472) working as SSE
(Works) Shahdol (Incharge) under ADEN, S.E.C. Railway,
Shahdol – MP. ……Respondents
Advocate for the applicant: Shri B.P. Rao
Advocate for the respondents: Shri Palas Tiwari
O R D E R
By Akhil Kumar Srivastava, JM-
The applicants are aggrieved by the order dated 08.05.2018
(Annexure A-2) by which the respondents issued intra divisional
transfer on administrative grounds. Referring to a provisional
seniority list as on 01.04.2017 (Annexure A-1), the learned counsel
for the applicants submitted that despite the fact that the applicant
no. 1 is senior to private respondents no. 3 to 7 and applicant no. 2
being senior to respondent no. 7, the respondents have posted the
respondent nos. 3 to 7 as In-charge of a Unit or Special of a
Branch/Unit, therefore, the applicants being senior to them are
bound to work under them and have also special powers to
discharge duties at his own will and discretion. The learned counsel
for the applicants further submitted that there must be a criteria
while posting the SSE/In-charge or SSE/Special and only seniors to
be posted on In-charge or Special. In this regard, the learned
Page 2 of 6
ANAND 2026.02.10
PRAKASH 14:09:34
DUBEY +05'30'
##PAGE3##3
counsel for the applicants submitted that before posting any SSE as
In-charge or Special, the respondents ought to have invited
applications from eligible and willing SSE which they have not
followed and thus the action of the respondents is unjust, arbitrary
and illogical and adopted pick and choose policy while issuing the
order dated 08.05.2018 and prayed to quash the same.
2. On the other hand, referring to the contents of reply the
learned counsel for the respondents submitted that transfer and
posting of an employee comes under the purview of the
administration and the decision of the competent authority is based
on the requirement of administrative needs. Learned counsel for the
respondents further submitted that the SSE/Special has to
discharge his duties as per requirement of the special work under
the concerned Assistant Divisional Engineer and has no special
powers to discharge duties as his will, as stated by the applicants.
Learned counsel for the respondents also contended that the
seniority is applicable for promotion and not for transfer and posting
therefore, it is not required to see seniority while issuing transfer
and posting orders. Learned counsel for the respondents further
submitted that there is no rule in Transfer and Posting Policy to
invite applications from eligible and willing