SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 1616

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI
Anand S Khati, Member (A)
Laxmi – Appellant
Versus
M/o Labour – Respondent
M.A. No. 2731/2024 | O.A. No. 4179/2015



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Yash Pal Rangi
For the Respondents: Hanu Bhaskar

Entitlement to minimum wages for part-time employees requires evidentiary proof of appointment terms and actual working hours; precedents from other jurisdictions are not automatically applicable without factual similarity and supporting documentation.

Headnote:The applicant, engaged as a part-time water carrier, sought wages in accordance with the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, claiming to have worked for 27 years for approximately five hours a day. The respondents contested this, asserting that the applicant worked for only thirty minutes to one hour per day and that the consolidated wages had been periodically increased by the competent authority. The primary issue was whether the applicant was entitled to minimum wages based on a precedent from the Gujarat High Court regarding part-time employees. The court reasoned that the cited judgment is not automatically applicable to the present case, particularly as the applicant failed to produce any documentary evidence regarding the terms and conditions of appointment or actual duty hours. the present OA is devoid of any merit and the same is accordingly dismissed.

Table of Content
1. dispute over the actual working hours and entitlement to minimum wages for a part-time water carrier. (Para 1 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
2. reliance on judicial precedent regarding the parity of part-time employees with minimum wage workers. (Para 2)
3. dismissal of claim due to lack of evidence and non-applicability of foreign jurisdiction precedents. (Para 9 , 10 , 11)

ORDER (ORAL)

Learned counsel for the applicant, at the outset, submits that the applicant was engaged by respondent no.3 as a part time water carrier. She was drawing an amount of Rs.500/- per month from respondents. She has approached this Tribunal seeking the following relief:

(i) Direct the respondents to grant the wages to applicant as per Minimum Wages Act, 1948 or any other act applicable, with all consequential benefits including arrears with interest @ 12% per annum from due date.

(ii) To pass such other and further orders which their lordships of this Hon’ble Tribunal deem fit and proper.

2. Learned counsel for the applicant relies upon the judgment of the Hon’ble High Court of Gujarat in the matter of Gujarat Rajya Anshkalin Karmachari Mandal Vs. State of Gujarat & Ors. in Writ Petition No.244 of 2014, highlighting para 2,3,4 and 5, which read as follows:

“ 2. This writ petition in the nature of public interest litigation was filed by the petitioner praying that wages paid to Gujarat State part-time employees as per Government Resolution dated 23.9.1998 has not been revised for the last so many years. Learned counsel for the petitioner has urged that price index has gone high, minimum wages have also gone high but the State Government has not revised minimum wages. The State Government issued a Notification dated 21.2.2014 wherein it was provided that Under Minimum Wages Act, 1948, minimum wages has been revised to Rs. 220/- plus special allowance per day for area A, Rs. 218/- plus special allowance per day for area B and Rs. 216/- plus special allowance per day for area C.

3. This writ petition was filed in August, 2014 praying that in spite of Notification dated 21.2.2014, remuneration for part-time employees Class-V has not been revised and they are being paid their wages as per the Government Resolution dated 23.9.1998. This Court by order dated on 4.9.2014directed for constitution of a five Member Committee and directed the Government to issue Circular in the line of directions contained in paragraph No. 2 of the order. Paragraph No. 2 of the said order is extracted as under:

"2. In our order dated 21st August 2014, in paragraph no.8, the following directions were issued.

1) The State Government shall pay to all its part time workers at the same rate of remuneration prescribed per day for the employment of sweeping and cleaning work under the said notification dated 5.8.2013 along with daily special allowance as payable subject to modification permissible under explanation (2) noted above with effect from 1.8.2014. In other words, for the salaries to be paid to all such workers across the State at the end of month of August 2014, such revised rates will be applied.

2) The Secretary to the Finance Department shall issue necessary circular to all the wings of the Government to implement such directions forthwith.

3) There shall be no change in the duty hours of any of these workers as long as such workers are in Government employment. The State Government shall present affidavit suggesting periodic revisions that may be adopted for remuneration of such persons from time to time after 1998."

4. It appears that since the directions were not complied with, contempt petition No. 2904 of 2014 was filed. Prior to the contempt petition was filed, the State Government has already issued Circular dated 6.9.2014 extending the benefits of minimum wages under the Minimum Wages Act to all part-timers i.e. those who are working for less than 4 hoursper day, they will be paid Rs. 110/- plus special allowance and those who are work

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top