Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
R. N. Singh, Judicial Member, Sanjeeva Kumar, Administrative Member
Amit Kumar Saini – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedural history and reliefs sought (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. selection process and signature mismatch discovery (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 9) |
| 3. parties concede identical prior judgments (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. reproduction of prior identical rulings (Para 11) |
ORDER (ORAL)
By Hon’ble Mr. R. N. Singh, Member (J)
The instant O.A. was initially filed and pending consideration before the Chandigarh Bench of this Tribunal, which on transfer came to this Bench of the Tribunal.
2. Pleadings in the O.A. are stated to be complete. With the consent of the learned counsels for the parties, the O.A. is taken up for consideration and disposal.
3. We have heard the learned counsels for the parties and with their assistance, we have also perused the pleadings available on record. In the present O.A., the applicant has prayed for the following relief(s):-
“i) Setting aside the impugned suspension order dated 23.03.2018 (Annexure A-9) vide which the applicant was suspended during the pendency of enquiry without passing the speaking order, setting aside the impugned enquiry report dated 30.12.2019 (Annexure A-15) in which the applicant was held guilty without proper appreciating the evidences available with t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
