Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
OM PRAKASH -VII, Judicial Member, MOHAN PYARE, Administrative Member
Parachute Factory Employees Union, Kanpur – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicants challenge cadre restructuring letters denying macp benefits. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. respondents defend promotion treatment for acp/macp denial. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. restructuring placement is fitment, not promotion. (Para 5) |
| 4. applicants cite prior cat/high court/supreme court precedents. (Para 6 , 7) |
Reserved on 10.02.2026.
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, ALLAHABAD BENCH ALLAHABAD This is the 13th day of February, 2026.
Original Application No. 330/00685 of 2014 HON’BLE MR JUSTICE OM PRAKASH -VII, MEMBER (J)
HON’BLE MR. MOHAN PYARE, MEMBER (A)
1. Parachute Factory Employees Union, Kanpur a Trade Union, registered under the Trade Unions Act, 1926 represented by its General Secretary Sunil Kumar Sahu S/o Sri Kalicharan resident of MI 342 Barra –II, Sabji Mandi Kanpur, PIN
208027.
2. Rajeev Kumar Parashar S/o Ram Sanehi Lal Parashar resident of B-4/101/Type – II New Defence Colony, G.T. Road, Kanpur PIN 208013.
.Applicants By Adv : Shri S.J Ishtiaque V E R S U S
1. Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Defence, Department of Defence Production & Supplies, Government of India, New Delhi.
2. Directorate of Ordnance (Coordination & Services) Kalkata MANISH KUMAR SRIVA
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
