Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Narendra Kr. Johari, Judicial Member, Kumar Rajesh Chandra, Administrative Member
Shipra Shalini Aind – Appellant
Versus
Government of India through Secretary, Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions (Department of Personnel and Training) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's appointment, spouse policy option, ignored promotion-transfer causing hardship. (Para 1) |
| 2. respondents defend transfer per service conditions, prior spouse benefit availed. (Para 2) |
| 3. court notes policy applicability, prior recognition, no specific denial reasons given. (Para 3) |
| 4. quash transfer for non-compliance; reconsider with reasons per spouse guidelines. (Para 4) |
ORDER
Per : Justice Narendra Kumar Johari, Judicial Member
1. For the sake of clarity, facts in the case as stated by the applicant in her OA, are delineated and discussed herein under :-
The applicant was appointed as Junior Translator in the office of the Principal Accountant General (A&E) on 16.07.2012 at Ranchi, Jharkhand. On 13.05.2025, options for choice of station were invited from employees, and in compliance thereof, the applicant submitted her option on 14.05.2025 seeking her retention at Ranchi. The applicant exercised her option particularly in light of the DoP&T OM No. 28034/9/2009-Estt. (A) dated 30.09.2009 for retaining her posting on the spouse ground at the same station, as her husband is working as a Section Officer in the Jharkhand Secretariat at Ranchi, which is a non-t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
