SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 1679

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Ramesh Singh Thakur, J, Anjali Bhawra, A
Satdev Vashisth – Appellant
Versus
Chandigarh Administration – Respondent
OA No. 86/2023



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Sh. Rishav Sharma
For the Respondents: Sh. Gagandeep Singh Toni

Deemed abolition under Finance O.M. 12.04.2017 inapplicable to continuously manned promotional posts; right to DPC consideration from vacancy date upheld despite prolonged inaction.

Headnote:(A) Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - Section 19 - Service law - Promotion - Deemed abolition of post - Applicability to promotional posts - Employee officiating continuously since 29.08.2017 against leave vacancy and thereafter post-retirement vacancy w.e.f. 01.02.2018 - Post not vacant as duties discharged uninterruptedly - Ministry of Finance O.M. dated 12.04.2017 and clarification dated 04.08.2021 held inapplicable to promotional posts continuously manned - Policy decision permitting operation of pre-01.04.2022 Recruitment Rules to avoid stagnation - Prolonged inaction in convening DPC despite recommendations and clearances violative of DoPT instructions dated 10.04.1989 etc. and Articles 14 & 16 - Right to consideration for promotion fundamental - Deemed abolition plea rejected as post functional with continuous correspondence - DPC directed to consider promotion w.e.f. 01.02.2018; impugned letter set aside. (Paras 9, 18-25)

(B) Constitutional Law - Articles 14 & 16 - Promotion - Right of fair consideration - Cannot be denied by mechanical application of deemed abolition to promotional posts - Ante-dated promotion confers eligibility for consideration by DPC, not automatic entitlement - Unrebutted legal submissions deemed admitted. (Paras 21, 23-24)

Facts of the case:
Employee joined as Record Keeper in 1994, promoted to Senior Assistant etc., assigned Superintendent duties w.e.f. 29.08.2017 continuously; case recommended repeatedly by HOD with clearances and outstanding ACRs; respondents denied promotion citing deemed abolition post 2018 retirement, despite policy allowing pre-2022 rules.

Findings of Court:
Post never vacant; deemed abolition inapplicable; right to DPC consideration from 01.02.2018 upheld; promotion if fit, with consequential benefits.

Issues: Whether post deemed abolished; entitlement to promotion on continuous officiation; obligation to convene DPC timely.

Ratio Decidendi: Deemed abolition under O.M. 12.04.2017 applies to direct recruitment, not promotional posts manned continuously; inaction violates timely DPC mandate and equality rights; consideration from vacancy date directed.

Result: Original Application allowed; DPC directed; impugned communication set aside. No costs.

Table of Content
1. applicant's service history and continuous officiation as superintendent since 2017 with recommendations for promotion. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
2. excellent acrs, violation of dpc norms, and inapplicability of deemed abolition to occupied promotional post. (Para 8 , 9 , 10)
3. respondents' contention of deemed abolition under finance om applicable to promotional posts. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
4. rejoinder denying abolition; post functional, promotion consideration is fundamental right. (Para 15 , 16)
5. court accepts continuous officiation, rejects deemed abolition, upholds dpc obligation under articles 14/16. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21)
6. directs dpc consideration w.e.f. 01.02.2018, sets aside abolition plea, no automatic promotion. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25)

O R D E R

Per: SH. RAMESH SINGH THAKUR MEMBER (J):

1. The present Original Application has been filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 has been directed against the following:-

(i) Against the inaction of the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in not promoting the applicant to the post of Superintendent from the date the applicant has started officiating i.e. w.e.f. 29.08.2017 when the then incumbent of the post of Superintendent proceeded on leave and finally retired voluntarily w.e.f 31.01.2018.

(ii) As per Statutory Recruitment Rules of which are based on Punjab Pattern, the post is required to be filled up by promotion from feeder cadre amongst Senior Assistant /Reader/Record-Keeper/Translator having 10 years regular service. A copy of the Recruitment Rules is enclosed as Annexure A-1.

(iii) Against letter No.12/2/351-hii(2)/10174 dated 12.07.2022 whereby the respondent No.1 has intimated that the post of Superintendent Grade-I stand deemed abolished in view of Government of India, Ministry of Finance letter dated 12.04.2017. Copies of letters dated 12.07.2022 and 12.04.2017 are enclosed as Annexures A-2 and A-3 respectively

2. The applicant has sought the following relief(s):-

(i) That the Annexure A-2 dated 12.04.2017 be quashed and set-aside in view of the decision of the DSP Ram Gopal versus Union of India and others (Supra) and in view of the Punjab Government instructions dated 06.06.2019.

(ii) It be declared that the applicant is entitled to promotion from the date he started officiating on the post of Superintendent with all consequential benefits including difference in arrears of pay and allowances with interest.

3. Lets have a quick glance over the facts first. The applicant joined service with respondent No.3 on 01.09.1994 as Record Keeper, was transferred as Translator on 01.03.1996, and has been working as Office Assistant/Senior Assistant since 26.07.2006. As per Government of India Notification dated 13.01.1992, in the absence of separate Recruitment Rules for U.T. Chandigarh, the Rules framed by the Government of Punjab apply to U.T. employees. A copy of the notification is annexed as Annexure A-4.

4. The channel of promotion from the posts of Reader/Record Keeper/Translator/Office Assistant (Senior Assistant) is to the post of Superintendent Grade-I, governed by the General Establishment (Administration) Department Notification dated 10.01.1969, which continues to be followed in the respondent department as no separate Recruitment Rules have been framed.

5. The applicant was assigned the duties of Superintendent Grade-I w.e.f. 29.08.2017 due to leave vacancy of the then incumbent Shri Paramjit Singh (Annexure A-5), who subsequently took voluntary retirement on 31.01.2018 (Annexure A- 5/A). After due consideration, the Presiding Officer (HOD) found the applicant fit and forwarded his case for regular promotion to respondent No.1 vide letter No. LC/26 dated 01.02.2018 (Annexure A-6). The applicant has since been continuously discharging the duties of Superintendent Grade-I without interruption.

6. The applicant fulfilled all eligibility conditions for promotion under the applicable Punjab Rules and was granted Vigilance Clea

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top