Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Harvinder Kaur Oberoi, J, Sumeet Jerath, A
Arvind Kumar Raizada – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. review sought due to counsel's misstatement during applicant's illness. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. applicant's grounds cite precedents against retrospective recovery. (Para 3) |
| 3. prayers for review; respondents oppose on limitation and eligibility. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. ra dismissed for delay, laches, and prior due diligence. (Para 6 , 7) |
ORDER
Hon'ble Dr. Sumeet Jerath, Member (A) :
The instant RA has been filed by the applicant seeking review of the order passed by this Tribunal in OA No. 2690/2019 dated 01.08.2023 which was influenced by a misstatement made by his counsel stating that the reliefs regarding re-fixation of pay and pension were not being pressed. This statement was made without the applicant’s knowledge or consent as he was unaware of the proceedings due to his grave medical condition.
2. The factual matrix of the case is that the applicant was appointed on 14.03.1977 in the Office of the Development Commissioner (Handicrafts) Ministry of Textiles as Technical Supervisorin the pay scale of Rs.550-900 (subsequently revised to Rs.6500-10500). Thereafter on 20.11.1995, the applicant was promoted to the post of Assistant Director (Technology) in the pay scale of Rs.2200-75-
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
