SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 1703

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Arvind Kumar Raizada – Appellant
Versus
M/o Textiles – Respondent


ORDER

Hon'ble Dr. Sumeet Jerath, Member (A) :

The instant RA has been filed by the applicant seeking review of the order passed by this Tribunal in OA No. 2690/2019 dated 01.08.2023 which was influenced by a misstatement made by his counsel stating that the reliefs regarding re-fixation of pay and pension were not being pressed. This statement was made without the applicant’s knowledge or consent as he was unaware of the proceedings due to his grave medical condition.

2. The factual matrix of the case is that the applicant was appointed on 14.03.1977 in the Office of the Development Commissioner (Handicrafts) Ministry of Textiles as Technical Supervisorin the pay scale of Rs.550-900 (subsequently revised to Rs.6500-10500). Thereafter on 20.11.1995, the applicant was promoted to the post of Assistant Director (Technology) in the pay scale of Rs.2200-75-4000 pursuant to the recommendations of the Departmental Promotion Committee duly approved by the Union Public Service Commission. Subsequently, the Central Government introduced the Assured Career Progression Scheme (ACPS) vide Office Memorandum dated 09.08.1999 providing for two financial upgradations on completion of 12 and 24 years o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top