Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Om Prakash VII, J, Mohan Pyare, A
Punnu Prasad – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts of unauthorized absence due to wife's illness disputed. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. parties argue on willfulness and enquiry fairness. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. precedents require proof of willful absence. (Para 8 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. no willfulness finding; compelling circumstances apply. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. orders quashed; reinstate treating absence as leave. (Para 16 , 17) |
ORDER
By Hon’ble Mr. Justice Om Prakash VII, Member (J)
The present original application has been filed by the applicant VA under section 19 of the AT Act, with the following reliefs:-
“(a) That the order dated 11.8.2000 passed by the Principal, Electric Training School, North Central Railway, Kanpur order dated 18.3.2010 passed by Senior Divisional Electric Engineer (RSO), North Central Railway, Allahabad and order dated 28.09.2011 received on 19.12.2011 passed by Additional Divisional Railway Manager, North Central Railway, Allahabad Division, Allahabad be declared illegal and same be quashed.
(b) That the respondents be directed to reinstate to applicant on the post hold by him with all the consequential benefits attached to the post.
(c) That any other and further relief which this Hon’ble Tribunal may deem fit and
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
