CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
R Chittibabu – Appellant
Versus
M/o Defence – Respondent
ORDER
BY JUSTICE AKHIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, JM:-
1.The applicant, in this Original Application is challenging the selection of respondent No. 5 on the post of Junior Engineer QA ignoring the claim of the applicant for the said post.
2. The brief facts of the case is that the applicant was initially appointed on 06.01.1983 as Craftsman in the Corps of Electronic Mechanical Engineering (EME) and posted at 3 EME Centre, Bhopal. The applicant was promoted as Havildar Major (Technical HMT) after completion of 9 years of service and after passing entrance examination of Diploma in Armament Engineering. The applicant was further promoted as Naib Subedar Technical on 01.04.1999 and thereafter, he was promoted as Subedar Technical on 01.09.2003. The applicant was retired from service of Armed Force on 31.01.2013. After retirement . from Armed Force, the applicant was appointed as Fitter Skilled in the . pay scale of Rs.5,200-20,200/- + G.P. of Rs.1,900/ on 01.02.2013 in the 506 Army Base Workshop, Jabalpur against ex-serviceman quota. While working as Fitter Skilled in 506 Army Workshop, the applicant has received information that an advertisement has been issued by the O/o Respondent No.4 for th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.