SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 1713

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
R Chittibabu – Appellant
Versus
M/o Defence – Respondent


ORDER

BY JUSTICE AKHIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, JM:-

1.The applicant, in this Original Application is challenging the selection of respondent No. 5 on the post of Junior Engineer QA ignoring the claim of the applicant for the said post.

2. The brief facts of the case is that the applicant was initially appointed on 06.01.1983 as Craftsman in the Corps of Electronic Mechanical Engineering (EME) and posted at 3 EME Centre, Bhopal. The applicant was promoted as Havildar Major (Technical HMT) after completion of 9 years of service and after passing entrance examination of Diploma in Armament Engineering. The applicant was further promoted as Naib Subedar Technical on 01.04.1999 and thereafter, he was promoted as Subedar Technical on 01.09.2003. The applicant was retired from service of Armed Force on 31.01.2013. After retirement . from Armed Force, the applicant was appointed as Fitter Skilled in the . pay scale of Rs.5,200-20,200/- + G.P. of Rs.1,900/ on 01.02.2013 in the 506 Army Base Workshop, Jabalpur against ex-serviceman quota. While working as Fitter Skilled in 506 Army Workshop, the applicant has received information that an advertisement has been issued by the O/o Respondent No.4 for th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top