Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Narendra Kumar Johari, J, Kumar Rajesh Chandra, A
Sanju Devi – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts of second wife's claim for family pension. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. applicant's arguments on pension rules and nominations. (Para 7 , 17 , 18 , 20 , 32) |
| 3. respondents' case for first wife and children eligibility. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 21 , 22) |
| 4. prior proceedings and impugned order compliance. (Para 23 , 24) |
| 5. void marriage disqualifies second wife; pension to legal heirs. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 6. precedents deny second wife claim; non-joinder bars oa. (Para 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 7. oa dismissed for lack of merits. (Para 33 , 34 , 35) |
O R D E R
Per Justice Narendra Kumar Johari, Member (J) :- Present OA has been filed by the applicant for the following relief:-
“i. For issuance of appropriate order (s) and direction(s) for quashing of the order, as contained in. Memo no E/Sett./F.Pension/Sanju Devi/2024 dated 06.11.2024 issued in signature of respondent no. 4, whereby, the representation of the applicant praying for grant of 50% pension has been rejected.
ii. For issuance of appropriate order/direction for fixation and payment of family pension of the applicant 2nd wife whereby application of applicant for granting family pension in lieu
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
