Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Ramesh Singh Thakur, Judicial Member, Anjali Bhawra, Administrative Member
Sahdev Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's initial appointment, promotion, and eligibility under diploma quota. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 16) |
| 2. prior oa by respondent-6 challenging promotions on seniority grounds. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 30) |
| 3. review dpc, show cause notice, and applicant's reversion. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 31) |
| 4. reliance on kartar singh judgment invalidating deemed university qualifications. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 32 , 33) |
| 5. official respondents' compliance via applicant's subsequent promotion. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 6. respondent-6's defenses: estoppel, limitation, diploma validity. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 37 , 38) |
| 7. applicant's rejoinder on fresh cause of action and diploma invalidity. (Para 27 , 28 , 39) |
| 8. analysis of kartar singh and supreme court clarification on diplomas. (Para 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46) |
| 9. diploma validity pending; oa dismissed for lack of merit. (Para 47 , 48 , 49 , 50) |
O R D E R
Per: RAMESH SINGH THAKUR, MEMBER (J):
1. The applicant has approached this Tribunal by way of instant O.A, under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act 1985, seeking the following relief:
“i) Call for the record and perused the same;
ii) quash th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
