2026 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 1871
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
P Purushothaman – Appellant
Versus
Ut Of Pondicherry – Respondent
O.A./834/2017
##PAGE1##
1 OA/310/00834/2017
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
CHENNAI BENCH
OA/310/00834/2017
Dated this the 28th day of January, Two Thousand Twenty Six
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR M. SWAMINATHAN. MEMBER (J)
AND
HON'BLE MR. M.L. SRIVASTAVA MEMBER(A)
P. Purushothaman,
S/o K. Balan,
Residing at Saketh,
Mundock, Mahe. .. Applicant
By Advocate Y. Kavitha for M/s. Giridhar & Sai
Vs.
l. Union of India
rep by The Secretary to Government,
Education Department,
Government of Puducherry,
Puducherry.
2. The Director,
Directorate of School Education,
Perunthalaivar Kamarajar Centenary
Educational Complex,
100 Feet Road, Anna Nagar,
Puducherry.
3. The Deputy Director,
Directorate of School Education,
Perunthalaivar Kamarajar Centenary
Educational Complex,
100 Feet Road, Anna Nagar,
Puducherry.
##PAGE2##2 OA/310/00834/2017
4. C. Cavoury
C/o Directorate of School Education
Perunthalaivar Kamarajar Centenary
Educational Complex,
100 Feet Road, Anna Nagar,
Puducherry .. Respondents
By Advocate Mr. R. Syed Mustafa for R. 1 to 3
##PAGE3##3 OA/310/00834/2017
ORDER
(Pronounced by Hon'ble Mr. M. Swaminathan, Judicial Member)
This OA has been filed by the applicant seeking the following relief:
“(i) To call for records relating to memorandum
No.13838/DSE/Estt. IV/D/2016, dated 14.11.2016,
rd
issued by the 3 respondent notifying final
seniority in the post of Lecturer and quash the
same
(ii) To call for records relating to order
No.12599/DSE/Estt. II/D/2016, dated 04.01.2017,
nd
passed by the 2 respondent and quash the same.
(iii) To direct the respondents to promote the
applicant to the post of Lecturer (Hindi) w.e.f.
25.08.1997 or in the alternative to appoint him to
the post of Lecturer (Hindi) w.e.f 22.01.1999 with
arrears of pay and allowances and reckon and refix
his seniority in the post of Lecturer (Hindi)
accordingly and with all other consequential
benefits.
(iv) to award costs, and pass such further and other
orders as may be deemed fit and proper and thus
render justice.”
2. The facts which are essential for adjudication of the case are as
follows:
The applicant obtained B.Ed Degree in the year 1988 and completed M.A
(Hindi) during the month of April 1992. He was appointed to the post of
Language Teacher Gr.II w.e.f. 20.10.1989. Pursuant to the amalgamation
##PAGE4##4 OA/310/00834/2017
of the posts of Language Teacher Gr.I and Gr.II, by order, dated
03.06.2008, he was re-designated as Language Teacher (Hindi) (now re-
designated as Trained Graduate Teacher) w.e.f. 25.08.1992. The applicant
further submits that while working as Language Teacher , he participated
st
in the selection for the post of Lecturer and secured 1 Rank in the written
examination and performed exceedingly well in the oral interview.
However, due to the pendency of OA filed by one Mr. K. Thamban
Koyithatta, the applicant was not appointed to the post of the Lecturer but
his batch mates who participated in the selection process along with him
for various other disciplines were selected to the post of Lecturer on
22.01.1999. The Applicant was subsequently appointed to the post of
Lecturer w.e.f. 11.10.1999 and he was placed much below his batch mates
in the seniority list for no fault on his part. Therefore, he submitted several
representation including the representation dated 15.07.2016 to reckon his
date of regular appointment to the post of Lecturer (Hindi) as 22.01.1999,
being the date on which he was selected pursuant to a written examination
and interview along with identically placed selectees in other disciplines in
the Lecturer Post and place his seniority at S.No.449 in the combined
seniority list for the post of Lecturer on par with Lecturers appointed w.e.f.
22.01.1999 with consequential monetary and service benefits. However,
the said request of the applicant was rejected by the order dated
##PAGE5##5 OA/310/00834/2017
04.01.2017, pursuant to the direction of the Tribunal in OA No.1351 of
2016. Hence the present OA.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the impugned order
dated 04.01.2017 passed by the 2nd Respondent and the final senior