Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
R.N. Singh, Member (J), B. Anand, Member (A)
Prakash Pant – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicants and respondents listed. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. prior tribunal order set aside by high court. (Para 4) |
| 3. undisputed cadre composition and prior seniority. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. applicants argue violation of n.r. parmar. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. respondents defend dop&t compliance. (Para 13 , 14) |
| 6. seniority must follow n.r. parmar. (Para 15 , 16) |
| 7. n.r. parmar quotes on rotation of quotas. (Para 17 , 18) |
| 8. seniority not based on vacancy year. (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 9. dop&t om 2014 inapplicable pre-2012. (Para 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 10. k. meghachandra protection inapplicable. (Para 25) |
| 11. prejudice presumed from seniority revision. (Para 27 , 28) |
| 12. impugned lists quashed; redraw per n.r. parmar. (Para 29 , 30 , 31) |
ORDER (ORAL)
Hon’ble Mr. R.N. Singh, Member (J)
In the present OA filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, the applicants, 32 in number, are aggrieved by the Seniority List issued on various dates. The applicants are also aggrieved by the office order dated 08.08.2019 vide which the official respondents have operated the Final Seniority List by asking for vigilance clearance of the private respondents after holding DPC for further promotion o
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
