Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Ramesh Singh Thakur, Judicial Member, Anjali Bhawra, Administrative Member
Krishan Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. parties and advocates identified (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. reliefs sought against impugned order (Para 3) |
| 3. macp implementation and service facts (Para 4) |
| 4. sixth cpc recommendations and rules (Para 5) |
| 5. applicants' entitlement claim post-4 years (Para 6) |
| 6. precedents granting similar relief (Para 7 , 8) |
| 7. legal notice and impugned rejection (Para 9 , 10) |
| 8. applicants filed no rejoinder (Para 11) |
| 9. hearing and pleadings reviewed (Para 12) |
| 10. applicants' submissions on resolution (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 11. prior bench judgment reproduced (Para 16) |
| 12. core issue framed for determination (Para 17) |
| 13. non-functional gp entitlement irrespective of mode (Para 18 , 19) |
| 14. same bench precedent followed (Para 20) |
| 15. no discrimination under articles 14/16 (Para 21) |
| 16. impugned order quashed, benefits directed (Para 22) |
| 17. no order as to costs (Para 23) |
O R D E R
Per: RAMESH SINGH THAKUR, MEMBER (J):
1. This Original Application has been filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 seeking the following relief(s):-
(i) To set aside the impugned order dated 25.04.2024 (Annexure A-1) whereby the respondents have rejected the claim of the applicant for the grant of Grade Pay
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
