Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
M. Swaminathan, Judicial Member
R. Savithri – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner, Head Quarters, Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's service history and cpf to gpf conversion claim. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. applicant's arguments: automatic conversion, parity, discrimination. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. respondents' defense: irrevocable option, limitation, no discrimination. (Para 10 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 4. tribunal hears arguments and frames core issue. (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 5. analysis of shashi kiran: switchover permissible despite option. (Para 21 , 22) |
| 6. no bar by limitation; high court judgments binding. (Para 23) |
| 7. quash rejection; grant gpf benefits with adjustments. (Para 24 , 25 , 26) |
(Pronounced by Hon'ble Mr. M. Swaminathan, Judicial Member)
This OA has been filed by the applicant seeking the following relief:
nd “(i) Call for the original file(s) records of the 2 respondents authority relating to passing of the impugned memorandums bearing No.F.11-
PFO30(ASO1)/31-2022-PF/Comp.No.17734/630, dated 19/26.12.2024 (Annexure A-12) & F.110125/1/2017/KVS/CPF to GPF/Court Case/Smt R. Savithri/1748, dated 11.01.2018 (A-5) and quash the same as illegal st (ii) for a direction to the 1 respondent authority to grant GPF (pension) Scheme benefits to the applicant in terms of the well
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
