Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
M. Swaminathan, Judicial Member
B. Jyothi – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's service history and cpf to gpf conversion claim. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. applicant's arguments on parity, discrimination, and binding precedents. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. respondents' defense of irrevocable cpf option and limitation. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 4. tribunal reviews arguments and frames core issue. (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 5. analysis of rajasthan and delhi high court judgments permitting switchover. (Para 21 , 22) |
| 6. principal bench rejects limitation for similar claims. (Para 23) |
| 7. supreme court dismissals affirm gpf eligibility despite prior cpf option. (Para 24 , 25) |
| 8. oa allowed with directions for gpf benefits and cpf refund. (Para 26) |
ORDER
(Pronounced by Hon'ble Mr. M. Swaminathan, Judicial Member)
1.This OA has been filed by the applicant seeking the following relief: nd
“(i) Call for the original file(s) records of the 2 respondent’s authority relating to passing of the impugned memorandums bearing No.F.No.PFO30(ASO1)/2/2024- PF/Comp.No.22876/362, dated 02.02.2024 and quash the same as illegal nd
(ii) for a direction to the 2 respondent authority to grant GPF (pension) Scheme benefits to the applicant in terms of the well
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
