US Constitution Trumps Presidential Tariff Powers
28 Feb 2026
Non-Compliance with Court Summons Amounts to Contempt: Allahabad HC Issues Warrant Against HDFC Life Branch Head in Cheating Bail Case
02 Mar 2026
Bank Can Adjust OTS Deposit on Borrower Default, No Cheating u/s 420 IPC: Delhi High Court
02 Mar 2026
Divij Kumar Quits CMS INDUSLAW for Independent Practice
03 Mar 2026
Global Lawyers Debate AI Liability in Autonomous Vehicles
03 Mar 2026
CCPA Fines Startup ₹8 Lakh for False Child Growth Claims
05 Mar 2026
Madras High Court Scoffs at Police Custody Injury Claim
05 Mar 2026
India's Criminal Investigations Face Systemic Conviction Crisis
05 Mar 2026
Kerala HC Slams TDB Financial Discipline in Ayyappa Conclave, Orders Auditor Report on Past Anomalies: High Court of Kerala
06 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Madhu Bandral – Appellant
Versus
Home Department – Respondent
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL JAMMU BENCH Transferred Application No. 61/462/2022 Date of Order: This, the 22nd day of December, 2025 HON’BLE MR. RAJINDER SINGH DOGRA, JUDICIAL MEMBER HON’BLE MR. RAM MOHAN JOHRI, ADMINISTRATIVE MEMBER Between Madhu Bandral, aged 53 years, D/o Sh. Rattan Singh Bandral, R/o Udhampur, at present Posted at Deputy SP, IR 3rd Battalion, Jammu.
…..Applicant -VERSUS-
1. State of J&K, Through Principal Secretary, Home Department, Civil Secretariat, Jammu/Srinagar.
2. Commissioner/Secretary to Govt.
General Administration Department, Civil Secretariat, Jammu/Srinagar.
3. Director General of Police, Jammu & Kashmir State, Police Headquarters, Jammu/Srinagar.
……Respondents Advocate for applicant(s): Mr. Abhinav Sharma, Ms. Saba Atiq Advocate for respondent(s): Mr. Hunar Gupta, Ld. DAG Reserved on: 08.07.2025 Date of Pronouncement: 22.12.2025 ORDER PER MR. RAJINDER SINGH DOGRA, ME
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the promotion of the petitioner to the post of Assistant Sub Inspector (ASI) in 2017 was justified, as it was granted after the completion of ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that promotions should be based on merit and not be arbitrary or discriminatory.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article