SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 14308

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Pritam Singh – Appellant
Versus
Aiims – Respondent
O.A./746/2024



##PAGE1##

1

O.A.No. 260/00746 of 2024

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL

CUOT.AT.NAoC. K2 6B0E/N00C7H4, 6C oUfT 2T0A2C4K

CORAM:

Reserved on 18.12.2025 Pronounced on 19.12 .2025

THE HON’BLE SHRI SUDHI RANJAN MISHRA, MEMBER (J)

THE HON’BLE SHRI PRAMOD KUMAR DAS, MEMBER (A)

Pritam Singh, aged about 29 years. C/o. Rana

Pratap Singh, House No. 133, At/PO-Dumari,

Ballia, Uttar Pradesh-221701.

……Applicant

VERSUS

1. Union of India, represented through

Secretary, Ministry of H & FW, Room-No. 156-

A, Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi-110011.

2. Director, All India Institute of Medical Science,

Bhubaneswar, At-Sijua, PO-Dumduma,

Bhubaneswar-751019, Dist-Khurda.

3. Executive Director, All India Institute of

Medical Science, Bhubaneswar, At-Sijua, PO-

Dumduma, Bhubaneswar-751019, Dist-

Khurda.

4. Senior Administrative Officer, AIIMS,

Bhubaneswar, At-Sijua, PO-Dumduma,

Bhubaneswar-751019, Dist-Khurda.

……Respondents

For the applicant : Mr. P.K.Chand, Counsel

For the respondents : Mr. A.C.Deo, Counsel

Mr. Abilash Mishra, Counsel

RAVI KUMAR

2025.12.19

10:22:38 +05'30'

##PAGE2##

2

O.A.No. 260/00746 of 2024

O R D E R

PRAMOD KUMAR DAS, MEMBER (A):

Rejection of the candidature of the applicant for the post of

Store Keeper-cum-Clerk under Economically Weaker Section

(EWS) category in AIIMS, Bhtou bdairneecstw tahre haaus thboeerinty c thoa lflielln guepd thbey

hvaimca ninc y thbiys cOonAs ipdrearyiningg t h“e candidature of the applicant, who

is qualified in the merit at Serial. No. 55 published on

30.07.2024 (Annexure-A/7) and also having experience for the

said post, by declaring the final result (Annexure-A/9) noted in

the column as “not eligible” and cancellation of the applicant’s

candidature is illegal and not sustainable in the eye of law,

which is based with no reason extracted in verbatim

” [ ].

2. Respondents-AIIMS filed counter in which it is stated that

the applicant, pursuant to the notification dated 01.07.2023, was

one of the candidates for the post of Store Keeper-cum-Clerk in

AIIMS, Bhubaneswar under the Economically Weaker Section

(EWS) category. In the advertisement, besides other posts,

RAVI KUMaApRplications were also invited for 85 posts of Store Keeper-cum-

2025.12.19

10:22:38 +05'30'

##PAGE3##

3

O.A.No. 260/00746 of 2024

Clerk, out of which 8 posts were reserved for EWS. The process

of selection was undertaken, as per rules, for all the vacancies in

various categories as advertised. Insofar as 85 posts of Store

Keeper-cum-Clerk is concerned, after the conclusion of process

of selection, 6 selected candidates under EWS category appeared

for document verification and 4 waitlisted EWS candidates,

including the present applicant whose name appeared Sl. No. 55

in the merit list, were also subjected to document verification.

During verification of documents, it was found that the

experience certificate submitted by the applicant was of a private

entity, i.e. Harianna Trading Co., where the applicant was alleged

to have worked as a Store-in-charge from June 2012 to June

2016 whereas the applicant submitted the essential qualification

of Graduation certificate, which he had obtained in 2020. In other

words, the experience certificate submitted by him before he

acquired the essential qualification of Graduation, as against the

specific condition stipulated in clause 1.4 of the Advertisement

making aware to the intending candidates that acquiring

experience must be after acquiring the prescribed educational

RAVI KUMAR

2025.12.19

10:22:38 +05'30'

##PAGE4##

4

O.A.No. 260/00746 of 2024

qualification of Graduation. Hence, his candidature for the post of

Store Keeper-cum-Clerk was rejected by the Document

Verification Committee. The applicant attempted to submit a new

experience certificate at a later stage, which he had not disclosed

in his application submitted within the due date pursuant to the

advertisement. Hence, the same was not accepted. It is stated

that after completion of the process of selection and document

verification, offer of appointment has already been issued in

favour of the eligible candidates belonging to the EWS

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top