Punjab & Haryana HC Denies Anticipatory Bail in Murder via Humiliation Case: Sections 103(1) & 3(5) BNS
07 Mar 2026
Security Deposit Forfeiture Without Show-Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice: Himachal Pradesh High Court
07 Mar 2026
S.202 CrPC Inquiry Not Mandatory for Public Servant Complaints If Accused Outside Jurisdiction: Supreme Court
09 Mar 2026
Professor MP Singh: Shaper of Constitutional Discourse
09 Mar 2026
Right to Promotion is Legitimate Expectation; Marriage-Based Transfer Can't Defeat It: Himachal Pradesh High Court
12 Mar 2026
Section 4 Official Secrets Act Presumption and Prima Facie Evidence Bar Bail in Espionage Case: Punjab & Haryana HC
14 Mar 2026
Centre Revokes Wangchuk's NSA Detention Amid SC Challenge
14 Mar 2026
No Interference Allowed in Religious Prayers on Private Premises: Allahabad HC Cites Maranatha Precedent
14 Mar 2026
No Proof of Absolute Ownership by Mizo Chiefs Bars Fundamental Rights Claim Under Article 31: Supreme Court
14 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Ravi Kumar Meena – Appellant
Versus
Staff Selection Commission (ssc) – Respondent
Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench, New Delhi O.A. No.1240/2024 Order reserved on 11.12.2025 Order pronounced on 18.12.2025 Hon’ble Mr. Manish Garg, Member (J)
Hon’ble Dr. Anand S. Khati, Member (A) Ravi Kumar Meena, Aged about 26 years, S/o Sh. Omprakash Meena, R/o Village Arniya, Post nagaon, Tehsil Gangapur City, & Distt: Sawai Madhopur, Rajasthan – 322201.
…Applicant (By Advocates: Mr. Setu Niket with Ms. Esha Mazumdar, Ms. Muskan Sharma)
Versus
1. Staff Selection Commission Through its Chairman Northern Region Block No. 12, CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi-110003.
2. Delhi Police Through Commissioner of Police Delhi Police Headquarters Behind Parliament Street Police Station, New Delhi-110001.
3. Addl. Commissioner of Police, HQ-II Recruitme
Judicial review of medical examination decisions in recruitment is limited to procedural adherence and significant discrepancies, with higher fitness standards for disciplined forces.
Judicial intervention in recruitment medical assessments is restricted; decisions by Medical Boards are upheld unless there's clear evidence of procedural violations or substantive discrepancies.
Candidates must exhaust all available remedies within the recruitment process before seeking judicial intervention, and the findings of Medical Boards in recruitment processes are generally upheld un....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article