CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Shyam Bihari Dwivedi – Appellant
Versus
Divisional Railway Manager N C Rly – Respondent
O.A./168/2016
##PAGE1##
Reserved on 31.10.2025
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
ALLAHABAD BENCH, ALLAHABAD
This the 18th day of December, 2025
Original Application No. 168 of 2016
Present:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Joshi, Member-(Judicial)
Hon’ble Mr. Anjani Nandan Sharan, Member- (Administrative)
Shyam Bihari Dwivedi son of Aditya Kumar Dwivedi Resident of
Village Singhpur, Post Sikandarpur, District Kannauj.
…..Applicant
By Adv: Shri N. P. Singh
V E R S U S
1. Union of India through General Secretary Manager North Central
Railway, Allahabad.
2. Divisional Railway Manager, North Central Railway, Allahabad.
3. The Chairman, North Central Railway Recruitment Cell, Nawab
Yusuf Road, Balmiki Chauraha, Civil Lines, Allahabad.
. . . Respondents
By Adv: Shri K. K. Ojha
O R D E R
Delivered by: Mr. Anjani Nandan Sharan, Member (A)
Heard Shri N. P. Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri
K. K. Ojha, learned counsel for the respondents.
2. The instant Original Application, under section 19 of the
Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985, has been filed by the applicants,
seeking following reliefs:
“I. To set aside the order for cancellation of candidature of the applicant
for the post of the Group ’D’ in grade pay Rs. 1800/- against the
employment notice No. 01/2010 as well as memorandum/order dated
15.09.2014 (No. RRC/ALD/Recruitment/Panel/ENN1/2010) (Annexure
NO. 2 to this Original application in Compilation II).
Further be pleased to direct the respondent no.3 to consider the case of the
applicant and select/appoint the applicant on the post of erstwhile Group
’D’ notified under Emp. No. 01/2010.
SAHIL SHARMA
##PAGE2##The respondent no.3 may also be directed to keep continue the
candidature of the applicant for the post in question until final
selection/appointment of the applicant.
II. any order of direction as this Hon’ble Tribunal may deem fit, just and
proper under the circumstances of the case.
iv. award cost of this application to the applicant. “
3. The facts, as stated by the applicant, are that the respondents
department issued an Advertisement bearing no. ENN 1/2010 for
the recruitment of Group „D‟ post, whereby the educational
qualification fixed for applying the said post was High School
passed. The applicant, being a General category candidate and
having requisite educational qualification, applied for the said
post advertised by the respondents.
3.1 After the acceptance of his form, the applicant was called for
the written examination on 06.05.2012 by issuing an attendance
slip in the name of the applicant bearing Roll No. 122104893. The
applicant appeared in the said examination and followed the
instructions of the invigilator during the exam. After being
declared successful in the written examination, the applicant was
again issued an attendance slip for appearing before the Railway
Recruitment Cell on 31.12.2012 for verification of his documents
and subsequently was called for physical efficiency test and was
declared medically fit vide medical certificate no. MED.C-
8/MED.-63 dated 01.01.2013.
3.2 While awaiting the final result, the applicant received a
memorandum dated 17.02.2014 stating therein that the applicant
has not adhered to the instructions and has performed mis use of
OMR at Sl. no. 71 by changing option „C‟ to „B‟ using fluid/eraser.
Further, the applicant was asked to show cause within 30 days of
issue of the said memorandum, as to why his candidature may not
be cancelled.
SAHIL SHARMA
##PAGE3##3.3 The applicant submitted his reply to the said memorandum
on 05.03.2014 denying the allegations of using fluid/eraser in the
OMR sheet, which was followed by a reminder dated 27.05.2014 to
the respondents
3.4 The respondents issued cancellation order dated 15.09.2014
stating therein that the applicant had not adhered to the
instructions endorsed on the OMR, hence the candidature of the
applicant was cancelled. Thereafter, the applicant submitted a
representation dated 10.10.2014 requesting therein to recall the
impugned cancellation order, but the same is still pending before
the respondents.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.