CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Chandrakant Bapuji Kirmire – Appellant
Versus
Deptt Of Posts – Respondent
O.A./2242/2016
##PAGE1##
1 OA No.2242/2016
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
MUMBAI BENCH, MUMBAI.
ORIGINAL APPLICATION No.2242/2016
Dated this Thursday the 18th of December, 2025.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. SHRI KRISHNA, MEMBER (A)
HON’BLE SHRI UMESH GAJANKUSH, MEMBER (J)
Chandrakant Bapuji Kirmire
Age : 50 Yrs., Occupn:Ex. G.D.S.B.P.M.
R/o Awalgaon, B.O. (Brahmapuri S.O.)
441 206) Distt. Chandrapur. ... Applicant
(By Advocate Shri A.N. Dighore)
VERSUS
1. The Union of India, Through
The Secretary, Ministry of Communication,
Department of Post, Dak Bhawan,
New Delhi – 110 001.
2. The Chief Post Master General,
Maharashtra Circle, Mumbai – 400001.
3. The Post Master General,
Nagpur Region, Nagpur – 440 010.
4. The Sr. Superintendent of Post
Offices, Chanda Division, Chandrapur
: 442 401.
5. The Sub Divisional Inspector of Post
Offices, East Sub Division,
Mil Aan lp hJa ac nk ss oon DD3P6MRLDF0b oooiN eaig lf7 cxsaat7: eaict tns tdaCa : 9 to Pi9l lJo2= 2C ny1 Dan06I : oN9 c s :2F9Id c ki, 5f g a e8es RO .n m= 1o41 ee= 24n0 adP t.0 e h dA 1ed1b e el2r7 py r s a10 f8 ho VM u03ban5 et:,di nh1 lae ra S9s so7l7n, o4= ir :b o O 2cMJ oc n7 5aI f5 :aD 6 + c t6 2h h3 0.k2 0a i8 5s s3 2r0 'o5 34d6n 0sd4 .o9 h 'fA c916t 0ul r6ep5a m14h=, 08a e0S80n n8E32s t1Rbo581IaA781L690N8aea4Ufcd0M1a58Be7458E8 bR48d=c29306 fdf89 7f205dd741cc 83f b9d864bbf0a1 b51f8d6bc4,, ,P Cho Nn =e= Bramhapuri, Dist, Chandrapur. ... Respondents
(By Advocate Shri P.H. Khobragade)
##PAGE2##2 OA No.2242/2016
ORDER
Per: Shri Umesh Gajankush, Member (J)
The applicant, before this Tribunal, is
challenging the punishment order dated 31.05.2007
issued by the Disciplinary Authority imposing
punishment of dismissal from service, Appellate
order dated 12.05.2008, Revisionary order dated
31.08.2009 and order dated 08.06.2018 passed by the
Reviewing Authority.
2
. Brief facts of the case are that on the
allegation of misappropriation amount of Rs.4167/-
and with the allegation of withdrawal of this
aforesaid amount through forged signature by the
applicant, charge sheet dated 30.04.2004 was issued
to the applicant. Thereafter, Inquiry Officer and
Presenting Officer were appointed. Departmental
inquiry was conducted and punishment of dismissal
has been awarded to the applicant which was affirmed
by the higher statutory authorities. Challenging
the aforesaid orders, it is the submission of the
Mil Aan lp hJa ac nk ss oon DD3P6MRLDF0b oooiN eaig lf7 cxsaat7: eaict tns tdaCa : 9 to Pi9l lJo2= 2C ny1 Dan06I : oN9 c s :2F9Id c ki, 5f g a e8es RO .n m= 1o41 ee= 24n0 adP t.0 e h dA 1ed1b e el2r7 py r s a10 f8 ho VM u03ban5 et:,di nh1 lae ra S9s so7l7n, o4= ir :b o O 2cMJ oc n7 5aI f5 :aD 6 + c t6 2h h3 0.k2 0a i8 5s s3 2r0 'o5 34d6n 0sd4 .o9 h 'fA c916t 0ul r6ep5a m14h=, 08a e0S80n n8E32s t1Rbo581IaA781L690N8aea4Ufcd0M1a58Be7458E8 bR48d=c29306 fdf89 7f205dd741cc 83f b9d864bbf0a1 b51f8d6bc4,, ,P Cho Nn =e= applicant that during the course of inquiry, all
the documents were not supplied to the applicant
##PAGE3##3 OA No.2242/2016
and, more particularly, the copies of Exhibit P-6
and P-7 were not supplied and, therefore, the
applicant was denied a reasonable opportunity of
hearing.
2.1
It is also submitted that the alleged
complaint dated 05.06.2003 which was the foundation
or basis of the instant charge sheet has not been
included in the list of documents and no such
documents were shown to the applicant during the
whole process of inquiry. Further, it was alleged
that the signature appearing on SB-7 withdrawal
form is fabricated one but such allegations are not
proved at any point of time. It is submitted that
as per the provisions of Rule 14(14) of
CCS(CCA)Rules, 1965, the oral and documentary
evidence by which articles of charge are proposed
to be proved shall be produced by or on behalf of
the Disciplinary Authority. But in the instant
case, the alleged complaint dated 05.06.2003 is not
at all produced as an evidence and thus violated
Mil Aan lp hJa ac nk ss oon DD3P6MRLDF0b oooiN eaig lf7 cxsaat7: eaict tns tdaCa : 9 to Pi9l lJo2= 2C ny1 Dan06I : oN9 c s :2F9Id c ki, 5f g a e8e
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.