SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 14941

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Dimple Singh – Appellant
Versus
Deapartment Of Home Affairs – Respondent
T.A./6977/2021



CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL JAMMU BENCH, JAMMU (RESERVED)

Hearing through video conferencing Transfer Application No. 6977/2021 Reserved on: - 24.07.2025 Pronounced on: - 11.12.2025 HON’BLE MR. RAJINDER SINGH DOGRA, MEMBER (J)

HON’BLE MR. RAM MOHAN JOHRI, MEMBER (A)

1. CT.DIMPLE SINGH SO NATHU RAM AGE 35 YEARS R/O THALLA, TEHSIL THATHRI, DISTRICT DODA.

2. CT.VINOD KUMAR S/O SHRI OM PARKASH RO ATHOLI PADDAR, TEHSIL PADDAR, DISTRICT KISHTWAR AGE 35 YEARS.

3. CT.MOHD YOUNAS S/O ABDUL RASHID AGE 35 YEARS R/O BHALLA TEHSIL THATHRI, DISTRICT DODA.

4. CT.ZULFIKAR ALI SON OF BASHIR AHMED R/O KOTYARA TEHSIL BHADERWAH DISTRICT DODA AGE 36 YEARS.

5. CT. IMTIYAZ AHMED S/O GHULAM ALI R/O SHICHA DOCHHAN, TEHSIL DOCHHAN, DISTT.KISHTWAR AGE 36 YEARS

6. CT. ABDUL HAMID S/O GHULAM HUSSAIN R/O GUNDNA, DODA, TEHSIL AND DISTRICT DODA AGE 38 YEARS.

7. CT. MOHD ASHRAF S/O MOHD SABIR KHAN R/O SUNARTHAWA, TEHSIL THATHRI, DISTRICT DODA AGE 38 YEAR.

8. CT. SUNIL KUMAR S/O SUDERSHAN KUMAR R/O BHATTA, TEHSIL AND DISTRICT DODA, AGE 37 YEARS.

9. CT. ZULFAKAR ALI SON OF SHRI SADIQ HUSSAIN R/O PONEJA, TEHSIL BHADERWAH DISTRIC DODA AGE 38 YEARS.

10. ASHWANI KUMAR S/O SHIV RAM R/O THATHRI, TEHSIL THATHRI, DISTRICT DODA, AGE 36 YEARS.

11. CT.ZAHOOR HUSSAIN S/O GHULAM MUSTAFFA R/O JOURA TEHSIL THATHRI, DSTRICT DODA, AGE 38 YEARS.

12. CT. MOHD ISHAQ S/O MOHD SHAFI R/O KOTLI TEHSIL BHADERWAH DISTRICT DODA, AGE 36 YEARS.

13. CT. IRSHAD HUSSAIN S/O GHULAM HUSSAIN R/O UDRANA, TEHSIL BHADERWAH, DISTRICT DODA 37 YEARS.

14. CT. JAMSHEED AHMED S/O MOHD AZAM R/O GANGATHA, TEHSIL AND DISTRICT DODA AGE 38 YEARS.

15. CT. ANIL KUMAR S/O RAM RATTAN R/O HIRANI, TEHSIL THATHRI, DISTRICT DODA AGE 36 YEARS.

16. CT. MOHD ASHRAF S/O NAZIR AHMED R/O BHELLA, TEHSIL THATHRI DISTRICT DODA, AGE 38 YEARS.

17. ASI SHABIR AHMED S/O MOHD IBRAHIM R/O TROWN, TEHSIL AND DISTRICT DODA, AGE 39 YEARS.

18. CT. ZAHOOR-UD-DIN S/O ABDUL RASHID R/O DHREVRI GANDOH, TEHSIL GANDOH, DISTRICT DODA, AGE 29 YEARS.

19. CT. NIRMAL SINGH S/O KEWAL SINGH R/O PERNOTE, TEHSIL BHADERWAH DISTRICT DODA, AGE, 30 YEARS.

20. CT. SHAFKET HUSSAIN S/O GHULAM MOHD R/O DHARVERY, TEHSIL GANDOH DISTRICT DODA, AGE 28 YEARS.

21. CT. IRVAN KUMAR S/O NARENDER KUMAR R/O CHILLY PAINE, TEHSIL GANDOH, DISTRICT DODA, AGE 28 YEARS.

22. CT. RAJINDER SINGH S/O MOHAN SINGH R/O BHARGI TEHSIL GANDOH DISTRICT DODA, AGE 28 YEARS.

23. HC BALWAN SINGH S/O CHAIN SINGH R/O GOAL TIKRI, TEHSIL AND DISTRICT UDHAMPUR, AGE 43 YEARS.

24. HC MOHD. RATI S/O SAMUNDER BHAT R/O THALELA, TEHSIL THATHRI DISTRICT DODA, AGE 45 YEARS.

25. SGCT ASHOK KUMAR S/O SWAMI RAJ R/O BATOLI TEHSIL BHADERWAH DISTRICT DODA, AGE 37 YEARS.

26. CT. JANAK SINGH S/O PRITAM SINGH R/O SHARORA, TEHSIL BHADERWAH DISTRICT DODA, AGE 36 YEARS.

27. CT. RANJEET KUMAR S/O SHADI LAL R/O BARSOO, TEHSIL BHADERWAH DISTRICT DODA, AGE 37 YEARS.

28. CT. SANTOSH KUMAR S/O SHIV LAL R/O KASHORA TEHSIL AND DISTRICT DODA, AGE 37 YEARS.

29. CT.RANJEET KUMAR S/O BADRI NATH R/O MATTA TEHSIL AND DISTRICT KISHTWAR, AGE 37 YEARS.

30. SGCT ASHOK KUMAR S/O SEJ RAM R/O PASSERKOTE, TEHSIL CHHATROO, DISTRICT KISHTWAR, AGE 38 YEARS.

(PETITIONERS)

(By Advocates: - Mr. Jasbir Singh Jasrotia and Mr. Arun Pratap Singh)

VERSUS

1.STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY CIVIL SECTT J & K AT JAMMU/SRINAGAR.

2.COMMISSIONER/ SECETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOME AFFAIRS, CIVIL SECTT AT JAMMU/SRINAGAR.

3.FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER, CIVIL SECTT. AT JAMMU/SRINAGAR.

4.DIRECTOR CODES, FINANCE DEPTT J&K AT JAMMU/SRINAGAR. 5.DGP JAMMU AND KASHMIR STATE POLICE HEADQUARTER JAMMU/SRINAGAR.

(RESPONDENTS)

(Advocate: - Mr. Rajesh Thapa, Ld. AAG)

ORDER Per: - Rajinder Singh Dogra, Judicial Member

1. The SWP No.994/2013 was transferred from the Hon’ble High Court of Jammu & Kashmir at Jammu and was registered as T.A No.6977/2021 by the Registry of this Tribunal.

2. The present matter was filed before the Hon’ble High Court seeking following relief: -

a) “It is, therefore, most humbly prayed that a writ of mandamus commanding upon the respondents to remove pay anomaly of petitione

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top