CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
P Krishnan – Appellant
Versus
M/o Defence – Respondent
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL CHENNAI BENCH O.A. No.310/00281 of 2021 DATED TUESDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE CORAM :
HON'BLE MS. VEENA KOTHAVALE, MEMBER (J)
HON'BLE MR. SISIR KUMAR RATHO, MEMBER(A)
P. Krishnan, 59 years.
Assistant Engineer (Civil)
Office of the Commander Works Engineer, Military Engineer Services Wellington Barracks, The Nilgiris, Tamilnadu 643 231.
..........Applicant (Advocate: M/s. V. Vijaya Shankar)
Vs.
1. The Union of India.
Rep by the Secretary to Government of India Ministry of Defence, New Delhi. -11;
2. The Engineer in Chief's Branch Kashmir House, Integrated HQ of MOD (Army)
DHQ PO, New Delhi-11;
3. The Chief Engineer Southern Command, Pune-411001.
…...Respondents (Advocate: Mr. K. Rajendran, Sr. CGSC)
O R D E R (Hon'ble Ms. Veena Kothavale, Member(J)
In this case, the applicant is seeking quashing of the order of the 2nd respondent dated 09.09.2019 imposing the penalty of Censure and for a direction to the respondents to grant promotions to the applicant on par with his colleagues and juniors with all attendant and consequential benefits.
2. From the facts on record, it is observed that the applicant was appointed in the Military Engineeri
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.