SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 15411

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Hevendra Singh – Appellant
Versus
Railway Recruitment Cell – Respondent
O.A./589/2020



(Reserved on 30.10.2025)

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL ALLAHABAD BENCH ALLAHABAD Pronounced on 02nd day of December, 2025 Original Application No.589 of 2020 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Joshi, Member (Judicial)

Hon’ble Mr. Anjani Nandan Sharan, Member (Administrative)

1. Hevendra Singh, son of Shri Ramsanehi, resident of village and post Gadi Akbar Madora, Teshil Mahawan, District Mathura.

2. Deepak Kumar Maurya, son of Shri Musaddi Lal Maurya, resident of village and post Laxmanptti, Gyanpur, District Bhadohi.

3. Pradeep Kumar, son of Kailash Kumar, resident of village and PUNIT KUMAR MISHRA post Mehharwanpur, Sanigawan, District Kanpur Nagar.

4. Mayank Singh, son of Mahaveer Singh, resident of Jag Jeevan Ram Nagar, District Firozabad.

5. Harish Kumar, son of Amarjeet Verma, resident of village and post Moti Ka Pura Pachhiyana (Khapradih) Block Tarun, District Firozabad (Ayodhya).

6. Rajeev Kumar, son of Ram Chandra, resident of village and post Chak Sikandar, Hanumanganj, District Allahabad.

....Applicants By Advocate: Shri Vinod Kumar VERSUS

1. Union of India through its Secretary, Ministry of Railway, New Delhi.

2. Chairman, Railway Recruitment Cell, North Central Railway (N.C.R.), Valmiki Chauraha, Nawab Yusuf Road, Allahabad.

3. Chief Personnel Officer (recruitment), Recruitment Cell, North Central Railway (NCR), Valmiki Chauraha, Nawab Yusuf Road, Allahabad By Advocate: Shri Ajay Kumar Rai

O R D E R

By Justice Rajiv Joshi, Member (Judicial):-

Heard Shri Vinod Kumar, learned counsel for the applicants and Shri Ajay Kumar Rai, learned counsel for the respondents at the time of hearing.

2. The instant Original Application under Section 19 of the Central Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985 has been filed by the applicants, who are six in numbers for the following reliefs:

(i) to set aside the impugned orders dated 28.07.2020 passed by the Chairman, Railway Recruitment Cell, North Central Railway (NCR), Allahabad (ii) To issue order, direction to the respondents to call the applicants in documents verification for selection on Group D post conducted by Railway Recruitment Cell, North Central Railway, Allahabad (iii) to issue order or direction to the respondents to appoint the applicants on Group-D post in North Central Railway, Allahabad, in case the documents of the applicants are found to be up to PUN M I I T S H KU R M A AR mark in pursuance of the Advertisement No.02/2018 published in Central Employment New (CEN).

(iv) Issue such other orders or directions in the appropriate nature which this Hon’ble Tribunal may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.

(v) Award cost of the petition to the applicant.

3. The brief facts as apparent from the Original Application is that the respondents invited application from eligible candidates for recruitment for the post of Group ‘D’ vide Central Employment Notification No. CEN 02/2018. Pursuant thereto, the applicants being eligible applied for the Group-D posts and appeared for the Computer Based Tests (hereinafter referred as CBT) and were declared successful. Thereafter, applicants were called for physical efficiency test, which was held in the month of March/April, 2019. The applicants appeared in the same and were declared successful. Accordingly, the applicants were called for document verifications and they appeared at the venue of documents verification. At the time of document verifications, all the candidates were required to put their signatures and fill up the document verification in order to verify the signatures/handwriting of the candidates. The signatures/handwriting of the applicants were also matched with the document verifications form with signatures/handwriting taken during the CBT, PET, but the signatures/handwriting of the applicants in the verification sheets could not be matched with the previous signatures/handwriting taken during written examination i.e. CBT as well as PET.

3.1 Subsequently, the respondents issued show cause notice on 19.09.2019 and 17.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top