SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 15472

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Manish Agarwal – Appellant
Versus
Department Of Personnel And Training – Respondent
O.A./514/2022



CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR Original Application No. 514/2022 Order reserved on: 31.10.2025 Date of order: 29.11.2025 CORAM:

HON’BLE MS. RANJANA SHAHI, MEMBER (J)

HON’BLE MR. LOK RANJAN, MEMBER (A)

Manish Agrawal son of Shri Subhash Chand Agrawal aged about 23 years resident of Plot No. 45 Jamnapuri 4P, Murlipura Scheme, Jaipur, Rajasthan mobile no. 8384993435 email id:

manish100742@gmail.com applied and selected GROUP A …APPLICANT (By Advocate: Shri D.P. Sharma)

VERSUS

1. Union of India through its Secretary, Department of Personnel and Training, through its Secretary, Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievance and Pension, North Block, New Delhi. PINCODE 110001 2. The Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Social Justice and Welfare, NISD Building, Fifth Floor, Sector-10, Dwarika, New Delhi. Pin code No. 110075.

3. The Union Public Service Commission through its Chairman, Dholpur House, Shajahah Road, New Delhi. Pin code No.110069

4. The Department of Revenue through its Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, North Block New Delhi. Pin code No.110001

5. IESSD, Manoj Roll No. 1046796, Rank 615 through Department of Personnel and Training, Through its Secretary, Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievance and Pension, North Block, New Delhi.

Pin code No.110001

6. Karanbir Singh Chouhan Roll No.886717, Rank 643 through Department of Personnel and Training, Through its Secretary, Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievance and Pension, North Block, New Delhi. Pin code No.110001 …RESPONDENTS (By Advocate: Shri Manu Bhargava)

YOGENDRA YOGENDRA SINGH MEENA C=IN, PostalCode=328001, S=RAJASTHAN, STREET =DHOLPUR, L=DHOLPUR, O=Personal, SERIALNUMBER=

SINGH 4e756f4c4c85f20cdefc1bed11c6cf501e5611721c1444fc

ORDER

Per: Hon’ble Shri Lok Ranjan, Member (A)

The present Original Application had been filed by the Applicant, who had succeeded at the Civil Services Examination (C.S.E.)- 2021 conducted by the Union Public Service Commission (U.P.S.C.) with a Rank No.446 – against non-allocation of any Serviceto him, sinceat the pre-requisite Medical Examination for him as a ‘Person with Benchmark Disability’ (PwBD) category, he was found not to fulfill Functional Classification (FC) and Physical Requirement (PR) of the posts/Services available at his turn.

2. Based on the pleadings of the parties, the relevant matrix of facts had emerged to be as follows, briefly. The Applicant had applied at the C.S.E.-2021 as a PwBD candidate under Sub- category Locomotor Disability including Cerebral Palsy (L.D.C.P.) whereupon he was declared successful at the C.S.E.-2021 by the U.P.S.C. with Rank No.446. Consequently, he had undergone the General Medical Examination on 27.04.2022 by the Central Standing Medical Board (C.S.M.B.) at Safadarjung Hospital, New Delhi – wherein the Applicant was found as ‘Fit for non-technical Services’, with specific mention of his sub-standard height and PwBD category (L.D.C.P. Sub-category 75%) ; and found to be ‘Unfit for technical Services’ due to sub-standard height. As additionally prescribed for PwBD candidates, he was also examined/tested by the Benchmark Disability Expert Panel (B.D.E.P.) at All-India Institute of Medical Sciences (A.I.I.M.S.), New Delhi on 28.04.2022 – wherein after due medical evaluation of his disability, inter alia of the various functional parameters and physical requirements, he was found to be a candidate under L.D.C.P. Sub-category, with permanent disability of/in “Muscular Weakness” and “Both Legs and Arms affected” (BLA) Functional Classifications, with 75% as the percentage of disability in his YOGENDRA YOGENDRA SINGH MEENA C=IN, PostalCode=328001, S=RAJASTHAN, STREET =DHOLPUR, L=DHOLPUR, O=Personal, SERIALNUMBER=

SINGH 4e756f4c4c85f20cdefc1bed11c6cf501e5611721c1444fc case. Notwithstanding, further in the Report of the B.D.E.P., as assessment of whether he met the 15 physical requirements prescribed for discharge of his duties –‘(Yes)’ had been entered on each. The result o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top