SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 15634

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Mumtaz Iliyas Khan – Appellant
Versus
Central Railway – Respondent


Central Administrative Tribunal Mumbai Bench, Mumbai Misc. Application No. 44/2025 (in Original Application No. 51/2025)

Order reserved on: 10.09.2025 Order pronounced on: 19.11.2025 Coram :

Hon’ble Mr. Umesh Gajankush, Member (J)

Smt. Mumtaz Iliyas Khan …..Applicant (By Adv: Shri A.V. Shinde)

Versus Union of India and Others, .... Respondents (By Adv: Shri N.K. Rajpurohit)

ORDER

Per : Umesh Gajankush, Member (J)

By filing the present in Misc. Application, the applicant has explained the delay in filing the Original Application by stating that after completion of total 32 years and 16 days of service she has retired to the post of Senior Peon on VERMA VIJAY KUMAR VERMA 31.10.2015 on superannuation. The Applicant states that out of her entire 32 years and 16 days of service, 4 years 11 months and 17 days are treated as Non-Qualifying service and total qualifying service was 27 years and 29 days.

2. The Applicant further states that she has submitted representation dated 28.08.2017 stating that even after she had work for the period of 32 years she is getting a very less pension of Rs. 18,000/- per month but no reply has been received till date.

3. The applicant submits that she is a senior

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top