SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 15855

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
P Sree Lakshmi – Appellant
Versus
Dept Of Revenue – Respondent
O.A./1092/2018



CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD BENCH OA/021/1092/2018 & OA/021/1093/2018 HYDERABAD, this the 4th day of March, 2025 Hon’ble Dr. Lata Baswaraj Patne, Judicial Member Hon’ble Mr. Varun Sindhu Kul Kaumudi, Administrative Member OA/1092/2018:

P. Sree Lakshmi, W/o Sri V. Subba Rao, Occ:Administrative Officer, Aged about: 41 years, O/o Principal Commissioner of Income Tax 4, Income Tax Towers, Masab Tank, Hyderabad R/o Hyderabad.

..... Applicant.

(By Advocate: Mr. K Ram Murthy)

Vs.

Union of India rep by

1. Union of India Represented by its Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Ayakar Bhavan, Hyderabad-500 004.

2. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax 4, Income Tax Towers, Masab Tank, Hyderabad.

... Respondents (By Advocate: Mrs. K Rajitha, Sr. PC for CG)

OA/1093/2018:

Sebastian Jude, S/o Mr Sebastian, Occ:Inspector of Income Tax, Aged about: 41 years, O/O Commissioner of Income Tax(DR), ITAT-II, B Bench, Hyderabad R/o Hyderabad.

..... Applicant.

(By Advocate: Mr. K Ram Murthy)

Vs.

Digitaly signed by KARAN DN: C=IN, O=CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, OU= KA RAN D P N P o h E O s o P t 5 n a A - e l 1 R C =

0 T o - M d 1 e 9 E = 3 N 5 1 T 0 S 0 O T 0 F 0 F 4 L P , O E L O R =H S R y O H d N e A N r C a E A b L a B d A H , N S A D = W T T A e R N la A n H IN g Y a IN D na G E , R , S A T B R A E D E , T = Page 1 of 9 cf00bb597b6051b5a127d240a608798336d0ecf5a9520b40169

89e62ec92ac4e, SERIALNUMBER=

Union of India rep by

1. Union of India Represented by its Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Hyderabad -500 004.

2. Commissioner of Income Tax(DR), ITAT-II, B Bench, Hyderabad.

... Respondents (By Advocate: Mrs. B Gayatri Varma, Sr. CGSC)

-----

Digitaly signed by KARAN DN: C=IN, O=CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, OU= KA RAN D P N P o h E O s o P t 5 n a A - e l 1 R C =

0 T o - M d 1 e 9 E = 3 N 5 1 T 0 S 0 O T 0 F 0 F 4 L P , O E L O R =H S R y O H d N e A N r C a E A b L a B d A H , N S A D = W T T A e R N la A n H IN g Y a IN D na G E , R , S A T B R A E D E , T = Page 2 of 9 cf00bb597b6051b5a127d240a608798336d0ecf5a9520b40169

89e62ec92ac4e, SERIALNUMBER=

COMMON ORDER (ORAL)

(As per Hon’ble Dr. Lata Baswaraj Patne, Judicial Member)

Since there is a common issue involved in the O.As, these O.As are taken up and heard together.

2. The relief(s) prayed in the O.As are as follows:

O.A./1092/2018:

By this Original Application, the applicant is seeking the following relief (s):

“ This Hon'ble Tribunal may be pleased to declare the in action of Respondent No.1, in not granting 15 ACP on completion of 12 years of regular service w.e.f. 18-03-2003, as arbitrary, discriminatory, illegal and violation of Article 14, 16, 21 of the Constitution of India and also against the Rules made under proviso of Article 309 of the constitution of India and also against principles of natural justice. Consequently direct the 1" Respondent to grant 15 ACP w.e.f.18-03- 2003 to the applicant on completion of 12 years of regular service along with interest @ GPF paying rate from the date of eligibility to till date of the payment with costs and along with all consequential benefits, if any, as per Rules in vogue, in the interest of justice and humbly requests to pass such other orders as deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of the case..”

O.A./1093/2018:

By this Original Application, the applicant is seeking the following relief (s):

“ This Hon'ble Tribunal may be pleased to declare the in action of Respondent No.1, in not granting 1st ACP on completion of 12 years of regular service w.e.f.10-11-2001 and also advance increments w.e.f. 01.01.2011 on passing ITI exam, as arbitrary, discriminatory, illegal and violation of Article 14, 16, 21 of the Constitution of India and also against the Rules made under proviso of Article 309 of the constitution of India and also against principles of natural justice. Consequently direct the 1st Respondent to grant 1st ACP w.e.f.10.11.2001 to the applicant on completion of 12 years of regular service and also advance increments as eligible on p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top