Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Sudhi Ranjan Mishra, Member (J), Pramod Kumar Das, Member (A)
A Vijaya Laxmi Naidu – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's service history and claim for automatic gpf switch (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. respondents' defense of limitation and cpf option finality (Para 3 , 6) |
| 3. prior tribunal decisions upholding cpf choice via secondary evidence (Para 4 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. applicant's arguments on deeming provision and precedents (Para 5) |
| 5. oa dismissed for lack of merit (Para 10) |
O R D E R
Hon’ble Mr. Sudhi Ranjan Mishra, J.M.
The applicant aggrieved by order dated 18.08.2021 wherein her prayer for extending the benefit of GPF cum Pension Scheme has been rejected has filed this OA praying for following reliefs:
a) To admit the OA & issue notices to the respondents;
b) To quash the order/letter dtd. 18.08.2021 (Annex. A/1) holding the same is outcome of non-application of mind and also opposing the policy of the Govt. of India which was validly adopted by the Sangathan;
c) To declare that the applicant is deemed to have been included in GPF-Cum-Pension Scheme and entitled to get all the retiral benefit accordingly;
d) To direct the respondents to release the benefits as due and admissible to her in accordance with GPF-Cum- Pension Scheme forthwith after adjustment of dues paid to the applicant;
e) To
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
