Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Manish Garg, Judicial Member, Rajinder Kashyap, Administrative Member
Ankita Choudhary – Appellant
Versus
Staff Selection Commission – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's rejection due to cut-off date for qualifications. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. cut-off date should be 01.01.2022 per dop&t om. (Para 4) |
| 3. crucial date 01.01.2021 binding; covid justified fixation. (Para 5) |
| 4. rebuttal: registration before application deadline suffices. (Para 6) |
| 5. cut-off fixation arbitrary, lacks nexus with exam date. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 6. oa outcome abides by pending high court decision. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
O R D E R
Hon’ble Mr. Rajinder Kashyap, Member (A):
By filing the present O.A. under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, the applicant is seeking the following reliefs:-
"A) To quashed and set aside Para 9.2 of Advertisement (Ann A-1) for recruitment to the post of Nursing Officer (Allopathic) Cat. No. NR 15921 Phase IX/2021 to the extent it provided illegally the crucial date for determining the age limit and Essential Qualifications etc as 1.1.2021 instead of 1.1.2022 declaring as illegal, ultra-virus, null and void, without jurisdiction and authority.
B) To direct the respondents to treat for recruitment to the post of Nursing Officer (Allopathic) Cat. No. NR 15921 Phase IX/2021 the crucial date for determin
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
