Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Om Prakash VII, Member (J), Mohan Pyare, Member (A)
Bansi Dhar Pandey – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of dismissal for misappropriation (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. applicant's arguments on procedural flaws and bias (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. respondents' defense of fair inquiry and proportionality (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. rejection of procedural objections; analysis of evidence (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. limited judicial review in disciplinary matters (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 6. dismissal upheld; oa dismissed (Para 20 , 21) |
ORDER
By Hon’ble Mr. Justice Om Prakash VII, Member (J)
The present original application has been filed by the applicant under section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 with the following reliefs:-
“(a) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari calling for the records from the respondents and quash the impugned order dated MANISH KUMAR 29.12.1995 issued by respondent No. 3 and also order dated 21.1.2014 passed by respondent No. 2 (Annexure A-5 and A-16 of compilation 1 to this original application respectively).
(b) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents and directing to them to reinstate the applicant in service with consequential relief of the salary and allowances.
(c) Isue a suitabl
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
