Reserved on 06.02.2026 CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, ALLAHABAD BENCH ALLAHABAD This is the 18th day of February, 2026.
Original Application No. 330/01432/2016 HON’BLE MR JUSTICE OM PRAKASH -VII, MEMBER (J)
HON’BLE MR. MOHAN PYARE, MEMBER (A)
Uma Devi (P/A No. 53616-B0 D/o Sri Ram Narayan, aged about 32 years, R/o K-1/245, Barra, World Bank Colony, Kanpur Nagar, U.P.
.Applicant By Adv : Shri S.K. Mishra/Shri P.S. Gaur V E R S U S
1. The Union of India through Defence Secretary, Ministry of Defence, Government of India, South Block, New Delhi.
2. The Air Officer Commanding in Chief, Maintenance Command(M.C.) Indian Air Force Vyasena Nagar at Nagpur Maharastra.
3. The Air Officer Commanding (Appointing Authority), 7 Air Force Nathu Singh Road, Kanpur Cantt., 4. The Officer Incharge, Civilian Administration, 7 Air Force Hospital, Nathu Singh Road Cantt. Kanpur.
5. The Lt. Col. Upasana, Military Nursing Officer (OT) through Principal Matron, 7 Air Force Hospital Nathu Singh Road, Cantt., Kanpur.
6. Col. P.P Zeenath, Principal Matron, Military Nursing Service, 7 Air Force Hospital, Nathu Singh Road, Cantt., Kanpur UP.
. . . Respondents By Adv: Shri K.K. Ojha
Reserved on 06.02.2026 CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, ALLAHABAD BENCH ALLAHABAD This is the 18th day of February, 2026.
Original Application No. 330/01432/2016 HON’BLE MR JUSTICE OM PRAKASH -VII, MEMBER (J)
HON’BLE MR. MOHAN PYARE, MEMBER (A)
Uma Devi (P/A No. 53616-B0 D/o Sri Ram Narayan, aged about 32 years, R/o K-1/245, Barra, World Bank Colony, Kanpur Nagar, U.P.
.Applicant By Adv : Shri S.K. Mishra/Shri P.S. Gaur V E R S U S
1. The Union of India through Defence Secretary, Ministry of Defence, Government of India, South Block, New Delhi.
2. The Air Officer Commanding in Chief, Maintenance Command(M.C.) Indian Air Force Vyasena Nagar at Nagpur Maharastra.
3. The Air Officer Commanding (Appointing Authority), 7 Air Force Nathu Singh Road, Kanpur Cantt., 4. The Officer Incharge, Civilian Administration, 7 Air Force Hospital, Nathu Singh Road Cantt. Kanpur.
5. The Lt. Col. Upasana, Military Nursing Officer (OT) through Principal Matron, 7 Air Force Hospital Nathu Singh Road, Cantt., Kanpur.
6. Col. P.P Zeenath, Principal Matron, Military Nursing Service, 7 Air Force Hospital, Nathu Singh Road, Cantt., Kanpur UP.
. . . Respondents By Adv: Shri K.K. Ojha
Reserved on 06.02.2026 CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, ALLAHABAD BENCH ALLAHABAD This is the 18th day of February, 2026.
Original Application No. 330/01432/2016 HON’BLE MR JUSTICE OM PRAKASH -VII, MEMBER (J)
HON’BLE MR. MOHAN PYARE, MEMBER (A)
Uma Devi (P/A No. 53616-B0 D/o Sri Ram Narayan, aged about 32 years, R/o K-1/245, Barra, World Bank Colony, Kanpur Nagar, U.P.
.Applicant By Adv : Shri S.K. Mishra/Shri P.S. Gaur V E R S U S
1. The Union of India through Defence Secretary, Ministry of Defence, Government of India, South Block, New Delhi.
2. The Air Officer Commanding in Chief, Maintenance Command(M.C.) Indian Air Force Vyasena Nagar at Nagpur Maharastra.
3. The Air Officer Commanding (Appointing Authority), 7 Air Force Nathu Singh Road, Kanpur Cantt., 4. The Officer Incharge, Civilian Administration, 7 Air Force Hospital, Nathu Singh Road Cantt. Kanpur.
5. The Lt. Col. Upasana, Military Nursing Officer (OT) through Principal Matron, 7 Air Force Hospital Nathu Singh Road, Cantt., Kanpur.
6. Col. P.P Zeenath, Principal Matron, Military Nursing Service, 7 Air Force Hospital, Nathu Singh Road, Cantt., Kanpur UP.
. . . Respondents By Adv: Shri K.K. Ojha (O R D E R)
BY JUSTICE OM PRAKASH -VII, MEMBER (J)
The present O.A has been filed by the applicant under section
19 of the Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985 seeking following
reliefs:-
“(i) To set aside the impugned termination order dated 28.06.2016 issued by respondent No.3 (Annexure No. A-1 with compilation No.1) and reinstate to applicant in service with all consequential benefits.
(i)-a To quash and set aside the impugned appellate order dated
23.02.2017 passed by respondent No. 2 (Annexure No. 1-A-1 with compilation No.1) and reinstate to applicant with all consequential benefits.
(ii) To issue a mandamus directing to respondent No.2 to decided the appeal dated 11.8.2016 of applicant within a stipulated period.
(iii) To issue any other direction or order as this Hon’ble Tribunal may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the applicant.
(iv) To award costs throughout to the applicant”.
2. The brief facts of the OA are as follows:-
The applicant was duly selected and appointed to the post of Civilian Group ‘C’ (Word Sahayika) pursuant to a notification published in Employment News dated 30.06.2012 to 06.07.2012. She was appointed vide appointment letter dated 06.11.2012 issued by respondent No. 3 and joined her duties on 31.10.2012 on probation. While discharging her duties, the applicant was subjected to a serious incident on 17.06.2015, wherein she was badly abused and assaulted resulting in her falling unconscious. She was initially given first aid at the hospital where she was working, but thereafter was turned out on the ground that she was a civilian employee. Subsequently, she was admitted as an emergency patient in Civil Hospital and remained hospitalized from 17.06.2015 to 27.06.2015. The doctors advised bed rest and later issued a medical fitness certificate permitting her to resume duties. After the said incident, the applicant suffered from severe mental trauma and was diagnosed with reactive depression and mixed anxiety disorder by doctors of the Air Force Hospital as well as Civil Hospital. Despite her medical condition, the respondents, under the influence of officers involved
SRIVASTAVA in the incident, attempted to dilute the seriousness of the matter by
falsely describing it as a case of insect bite. The applicant’s father
made a written complaint dated 22.07.2015 to respondent No. 3,
seeking an enquiry into the incident. However, no proper enquiry
was conducted and the complaint was ignored. Instead, the applicant was repeatedly harassed by issuance of notices and warning letters, despite her submitting detailed replies explaining her condition and denying the allegations. Due to the continuous harassment and the earlier incident, the applicant again suffered from reactive depression in September 2015 and was medically examined at a mental health care centre in Lucknow. Eve
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.