Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Harvinder Kaur Oberoi, Judicial Member, Sumeet Jerath, Administrative Member
Gaurav – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. common facts of consolidated postal assistant oas (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. precedent from similar oa quashing charges (Para 6) |
| 3. extract from precedent oa facts and arguments (Para 7) |
| 4. precedent judgments on expert opinion limits (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. gujarat hc upholds quashing charges (Para 11) |
| 6. binding precedent rejects respondents' cases (Para 12) |
ORDER
Hon’ble Ms. Harvinder Kaur Oberoi, Member (J)
1. Since a common question of facts and law is involved in the present Original Applications, with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, all the OAs were heard together and are being decided by this common order. For the sake of brevity, the facts are primarily being extracted from OA No. 1418/2022.
2. By way of the present O.A. filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, the applicant has prayed for quashing of the impugned charge memorandum and for grant of consequential benefits.
3. The claim of the applicant has been contested by the respondents by filing their reply. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the pleadings and documents available on record.
4. It is not in dispute that the applicant had applied fo
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
