Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Rajiv Joshi, Judicial Member
Vivekanand Pandey – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicants qualified selection stages; process cancelled post-result. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. vigilance complaints led to cancellation without specifics disclosed. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. impugned order unreasoned; violates rbe 192/2019 notice requirement. (Para 8) |
| 4. no final panel; no vested rights per respondents. (Para 9) |
| 5. result not final select list; rbe inapplicable. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 6. irregularities technical, no candidate prejudice or malpractice. (Para 16) |
O R D E R
Heard Shri Shyamal Narain, assisted by Shri Lakhan Singh Kushwaha, learned counsel for the applicants and Shri Atul Kumar Shahi, learned counsel for the respondents at the time of hearing.
2. This Original Application is filed by the applicants, who are 12 in numbers, under section 19 of the Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985, seeking following reliefs:-
8. (i) (a) This Hon’ble Tribunal may graciously be pleased to quash the impugned order dated 07.03.2024.
(i) This Hon’ble Tribunal may be pleased to direct the respondents to issue posting orders in respect of applicants for the post of Stenographer Level-4 in GP of Rs.2400/- in pursuance of final result dated 05.12.2023 with all conse
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
